After parting ways with Barnabas, Paul, accompanied by Silas as his fellow worker, returned to Asia Minor, visiting groups of believers in the various cities where he had been before, including Derbe and Lystra in the Roman province of Galatia. (Acts 15:36-16:1) According to the wording of Acts 16:1, Timothy may either have lived in Lystra or Derbe. Lystra appears to have been the more likely place. The “brothers” or believers in Lystra and nearby Iconium spoke highly of him, with no mention being made of any believers from Derbe doing so (as one would expect if Timothy’s home had been in Derbe). (Acts 16:2)
Timothy had a Greek father and a Jewish mother named Eunice. Both his mother and his grandmother Lois became believers, likely at the time Paul and Barnabas first began proclaiming the message about Christ in Asia Minor. The Greek father appears not to have objected to his son’s being taught the content of the Jewish holy writings. Thus Timothy had come to know the sacred scriptures from infancy or from what would have been his earliest recollection. (2 Timothy 1:5; 3:15) Nevertheless, he was not a fully integrated part of the Jewish community. He had not been circumcised on the eighth day in keeping with the Mosaic law, most likely because his Greek father did not permit it. (Acts 16:3)
Paul expressed the desire for Timothy to accompany him and Silas in their work of making known the message about Jesus Christ and in strengthening fellow believers. The apostle, joined by elders (evidently from Lystra), laid hands on Timothy, designating him for this special service. Jews in the region were fully aware that Timothy’s father was a Greek. Apparently to prevent any problems with fellow Jews about Timothy’s not being identified as sharing his mother’s Jewish heritage, Paul circumcised him. (Acts 16:3; 1 Timothy 4:14; 2 Timothy 1:6)
Over the years a close bond formed between Paul and Timothy, and the apostle had the highest regard for him as a loyal servant of Christ. In his letter to the Philippians, Paul referred to Timothy as having an outstandingly commendable disposition and being genuinely concerned about them. Like a reliable, trustworthy, and diligent son, Timothy had labored shoulder to shoulder with Paul in the advancement of Christ’s cause. (Philippians 2:20-22)
At the time Timothy received the letter known as 1 Timothy, he was in Ephesus, and Paul asked him to remain there to care for essential matters involving the community of believers. The book of Acts does not include any reference to Timothy’s being asked to stay in Ephesus while Paul was on his way to Macedonia. Furthermore, the Acts account does not mention the apostle’s request for Timothy to remain in Ephesus on yet another occasion. If the narration in the book of Acts about Timothy’s activity is sufficiently complete, this would provide a basis for concluding that the letter was written after the end of Paul’s first imprisonment in Rome and his subsequent release. The second letter would then have been written after the apostle had again been arrested and found himself imprisoned in Rome. The apostle’s comments in the second letter indicate that he expected to be executed. (1 Timothy 1:3; 2 Timothy 4:6-8)
While there have been those who claim that Paul could not have written these letters, their arguments contribute nothing of real value to the understanding of the preserved message. Both letters open with the writer identifying himself as “Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus,” and the personal comments to Timothy are representative of a very close relationship that is consistent with the apostle’s other letters. Of the fourteen books anciently attributed to Paul, questions were only raised in early centuries about the book of Hebrews.
The radically different style of the book of Hebrews caused some to conclude that Paul may have originally written it in Hebrew and then either Luke or Clement had translated it into Greek. Origen (c.185-c. 254 CE), quoted by Eusebius in his Ecclesiastical History (Book VI, 25.11) commented that the letter to the Hebrews is closer to Greek usage than were the other letters, as would be acknowledged by anyone able to recognize style differences. Nothing of this nature, though, was ever said about 1 or 2 Timothy, and it should be noted that the book of Hebrews makes no mention of Paul as the writer. Therefore, without unmistakable evidence to the contrary, 1 and 2 Timothy should be accepted as being from the apostle Paul and written to Timothy.
As an apostle of Jesus Christ, Paul had been commissioned to make known the message about him. Paul’s coming to be an apostle, or one who had been sent forth as a messenger, proved to be “according to the command [promise (fourth-century Codex Sinaiticus)] of God” and “of Christ Jesus,” indicating that both God and Christ had decreed that he would serve in this capacity and under their direction. (1:1)
God is called the “Savior,” for he sent his Son to the earth to surrender his life for sinful humans, making it possible for all who responded in faith to be saved or liberated from sin and condemnation. Jesus Christ is the “hope” of believers, for through him all the promises of his Father will be fulfilled. Apart from Jesus, believers would have no hope of coming to be sinless children of God and enjoying all the blessings associated therewith. (1:1)
The apostle addressed Timothy as a “genuine” or “true child in the faith.” A number of translations represent this to mean that Timothy was a true child to the apostle (“a true child to me because you believe” [NCV]; “his [Paul’s] true-born son in the faith” [REB]; “because of our faith, you are like a son to me” [CEV]; “my true child in faith” [NAB]). In 2 Timothy 2:1, the apostle specifically referred to Timothy as “my child,” for he was like a father to the young man and had taught him by word and example. The absence of the personal pronoun “my” in the Greek text of 1 Timothy 1:2, however, could indicate that Paul affectionately spoke of his younger fellow worker as a “true child in the faith,” that is, a genuine and dearly beloved fellow believer. (1:2)
The apostle’s prayerful desire for Timothy was that he might have “favor, mercy [and] peace from God [the] Father and Christ Jesus our Lord.” The gracious “favor” or unmerited kindness would include the aid and guidance God and the Lord Jesus Christ would provide. “Mercy” would involve continuing to be a recipient of their compassionate care, Christ’s intercession, and his Father’s forgiveness. “Peace” would be the sense of well-being and security arising from being fully aware of the love of God and Christ. (1:2; see the Notes section.)
On an earlier occasion, Paul had appealed to Timothy to remain in Ephesus while he was on his way to Macedonia. No mention is made of this in the book of Acts. This may be an indication that the reference is to an incident after Paul’s first imprisonment in Rome ended, as the Acts account closes with the apostle’s still being in confinement. At the time the apostle wrote the letter, he again requested that Timothy stay in Ephesus. Problems had arisen in the community of believers there, and Paul wanted him to assist the congregation to take corrective action. Certain ones in Ephesus taught things that did not accord with the truth Christ had revealed. Therefore, Paul instructed Timothy that he should command them not to teach other doctrines and not to focus on myths and endless genealogies. The context does not provide any indication about these myths or the lengthy genealogies. In view of the later mention of the law, the reference is likely to Jewish fables and genealogies. (1:3, 4)
While myths and genealogies gave rise to “searching,” debating, or controversy, they were no part of the “stewardship of God [pertaining to] faith.” Nothing associated with myths and genealogies promoted faith in God and Christ. They were distracting elements, dispensing nothing beneficial as does the sound teaching that had been divinely entrusted to Paul as a stewardship. (1:4; see the Notes section on verse 4 regarding myths and genealogies.)
The apostle’s command to stop wrong teaching and preoccupation with myths and genealogies served to promote “love out of a clean heart,” “a good conscience, and unhypocritical faith.” This would be a genuine love for God and fellow humans that had its source in a pure or undefiled “heart” or inner self. Such love would include a willingness to forego personal rights out of regard for the interests of others. The individual would be living uprightly and thus preserve a good conscience. An unhypocritical faith would be a trust in God and Christ that prompted a caring response to the needs of others. This faith would not be a mere expression of belief. (1:5)
Certain ones in the community of believers had not pursued the right course, having deviated from showing genuine love and failed to maintain a good conscience and a living faith productive of praiseworthy deeds. As a consequence, they had turned aside from wholesome teaching and engaged in empty, valueless, idle, or speculative talk. (1:6)
They wanted to be teachers of the law that God had given to the Israelites but misunderstood its purpose. Lacking a proper view of the law, they had no understanding of the subject matter and so did not know what they were talking about. Yet they made dogmatic assertions about things they did not rightly comprehend. (1:7)
Referring to himself and Timothy (if not using the first person editorial plural), Paul continued, “But we know that the law [is] good, if one uses it lawfully.” The provisions contained in the law were good and served to protect obedient ones from harm and promoted their well-being. Those who understood the purpose of the law could use it lawfully or legitimately. (1:8)
God did not give the law to the Israelites because they were righteous. Laws are not formulated for upright persons but for those who violate standards of propriety. Intended to restrain wayward conduct, law is for the lawless ones— unruly or defiant persons, the godless and sinners, the unholy and profane or the morally corrupt, persons who would murder a father or a mother, manslayers, practicers of sexual immorality, men who have sexual relations with other men, kidnappers or those who seize others to sell them as slaves, liars, perjurers, and persons who act contrary to the “healthy” or sound teaching that is in harmony with “the evangel of the glory of the happy [makários] God.” (1:9-11)
In being linked to the words “of the glory,” the “evangel” (or the good news about Jesus Christ) may be designated as glorious or magnificent because of its incomparably great value. The Greek word makários can be rendered “happy,” “fortunate,” or “blessed.” With reference to God, the term may be understood to denote a state of matchless well-being, contentment, and satisfaction. Paul had been entrusted with this good news, which called for him to proclaim the message that had God as the ultimate source. (1:11)
The apostle was grateful to the Lord Jesus Christ for having empowered him to carry out his commission, having considered him faithful or trustworthy to be granted a service or ministry. Paul deeply appreciated that Jesus Christ had the confidence in him that he would faithfully discharge the commission that had been given to him. (1:12) This was especially the case because of his former course of life. Paul had been a “blasphemer,” for he had looked upon Jesus as an impostor or a false Messiah. His failure to honor Jesus as the Son of God meant that he had dishonored the Father who had sent him. In attitude and action, Paul had reproached Christ and so was guilty of blaspheming him and his Father. He had persecuted Jesus Christ’s disciples and sided with those who wanted to impose the death penalty upon them. (Acts 8:1; 9:1, 2; 22:19, 20; 26:9-11) In his vicious campaign of persecution, Paul had acted in an insolent or haughty manner. But he was shown mercy or granted forgiveness upon repenting. He had not defiantly set himself in opposition to what he knew to be true but had been in a state of ignorance or blindness when conducting himself like a person without faith in God and Christ. (1:13)
To Paul, Christ’s gracious favor or unmerited kindness had overflowed or been superabundantly bestowed, for he had been forgiven for his wrong course and commissioned as an apostle. He had come to have faith and love. Formerly, as a persecutor, he did not have the faith that centered in Christ and had shown hatred, not love, for Christ’s followers. “Faith and love in Christ Jesus” may mean the faith and love of which Christ is the source or the faith and love that Paul came to have by coming to be at one with Christ. (1:14)
The apostle identified the “word” or statement he next made as being trustworthy or reliable and deserving of “all” or full acceptance. This “word” is, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners,” providing the basis through his sacrificial death for deliverance from sin and condemnation. Because of his past as a blasphemer, a persecutor, and a haughty man, Paul spoke of himself as “first” or foremost among sinners. (1:15)
The reason he was shown mercy, however, was that in him “first,” or foremost in his case, Christ Jesus might show “all,” or the superlative extent, of his patience or forbearance as an example to those believing on him for eternal life. Christ’s forbearance in Paul’s case would assure all other believers that they, too, would be forgiven upon putting faith in the Son of God and would come to have eternal life, the real life of an enduring approved relationship with the Son and his Father. (1:16)
The Father is the source of the gracious favor or incomprehensibly great kindness Paul had been shown. This is the apparent reason for the prayerful words, “But to the King of the ages, incorruptible [and] invisible, the only God, [be] honor and glory for the ages of the ages. Amen.” For the “ages” or for all eternity, the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ is the King or Sovereign, with everyone being subject to him. He is the living God, incorruptible or deathless and invisible to human eyes. While there are those whom humans may call “god,” he alone is such in the ultimate sense, for only he is the Most High. Honor or dignity and glory, splendor, or magnificence belong to him and are rightly ascribed to him and that for all the ages to come or for eternity. Appropriately, the apostle ended with “Amen” (so be it; truly; surely). (1:17; see the Notes section.)
Based on the context, Paul’s charge to Timothy (whom he affectionately called “child”) related to his correcting the situation that had developed on account of those who taught falsehoods in Ephesus. When discharging the directive the apostle had given him, he was to do so according to earlier prophecies about him, so that he might, on the basis of these prophecies, “fight the good fight.” Seemingly, at the time Paul chose him to be his travel companion and, with elders from the community of believers, laid hands upon him, either he or one or more of the elders then present spoke prophetically about the service Timothy would render. (Acts 16:1-3; 1 Timothy 4:14; 2 Timothy 1:6; compare Acts 13:1-3.) The “good fight” would be the firm stand he was to take against error, remembering that, as the previous prophetic words about him revealed, he had divine backing when discharging his responsibilities. (1:18)
In carrying out his assignment, Timothy needed to maintain “faith,” an unbreakable trust in God and Christ, and a “good conscience” by upholding and defending what was right and fair. Certain ones had shoved a good conscience aside, refusing to be guided by it. This resulted in their experiencing shipwreck respecting their faith. They deviated from living the kind of exemplary life that an active faith prompts, thus revealing that their faith or trust in God and Christ had been wrecked. (1:19)
Among those with a ruined faith were Hymenaeus and Alexander. According to 2 Timothy 2:17, 18, Hymenaeus maintained that the resurrection had already occurred. This may have been a denial about a future resurrection and judgment, which might then have been presented as a basis for the claim that the manner in which one lived really did not matter.
Paul handed Hymenaeus and Alexander over to Satan, expelling them from the community of believers and exposing them to the world where the adversary exercises authority. This placed them outside the realm where God’s spirit is at work. Finding themselves in the realm where people lived without any knowledge of God and were primarily guided by their sensual desires, they would learn from the severe discipline not to blaspheme if they wanted to be part of the congregation again. (1:20)
Notes:
In verse 2, numerous manuscripts read “our Father.”
Verse 4 mentions “myths and genealogies.” The Babylonian Talmud contains numerous rabbinic fables or myths. One of these involves Rabbah bar Bar Hannah. He said that on one occasion an Arab told him, “Come, I will show you those swallowed up with Korah.” Then, at a place where there were two cracks in the ground and from which steam ascended, the Arab soaked a ball of wool in water and “placed it on the point of a spear,” singeing the wool when he passed it there. “He said to me: ‘Listen to what you hear.’ And I heard them saying thus: ‘Moses and his Torah are true, and [we] are liars.’” The Arab said to Rabbah bar Bar Hannah, “Every thirty days Gehinom returns them like meat in a pot, and they say thus: ‘Moses and his Torah are true, and [we] are liars.’” (Babylonian Talmud, Steinsaltz Edition, Sanhedrin 110a, b)
According to the Babylonian Talmud (Pesahim, 62b), the daughter of Hanina ben Teradion studied 300 laws from 300 teachers in one day (which is probably an exaggeration) but could not complete the “Book of Genealogies” (likely designating a commentary on Chronicles, specifically its many genealogical lists) in three years. Regarding the passage beginning with the words “And Azel had six sons” (1 Chronicles 8:38) and ending with “these were the sons of Azel” (1 Chronicles 9:44), the many different interpretations are referred to as being the loads of “four hundred camels.” Although doubtless to be regarded as hyperbole, the comments illustrate that preoccupation with genealogies would have been a time-consuming effort that gave rise to questions and debates.
Many manuscripts (in verse 17) read, “only wise God,” and a number of manuscripts either include the word “deathless” (“incorruptible, invisible, deathless”) or say “deathless” instead of “incorruptible.”
The conjunction “therefore” (oun) concerns matters to which Timothy needed to give attention while in Ephesus. Paul urged that, when the community of believers assembled, “supplications [déesis], prayers, intercessions and thanksgivings” be made “for all men” or for all people. He introduced this appeal with the words “first of all.” This could mean that prayer for all people is of prime importance. Another possibility is that, among other matters, Paul was making the request concerning prayer first. (2:1)
The Greek term déesis may refer to a very intense form of prayer, with the individual approaching God as a suppliant or a beggar. Prayers are requests or petitions directed to God, and intercessions are prayers on behalf of others. Thanksgivings are expressions of gratitude for God’s gifts, blessings, guidance, and aid. (2:1)
Believers were to pray for kings and all others occupying high positions. This was most appropriate, for rulers could use their authority for the benefit or to the injury of Christ’s disciples. The attitude of rulers toward them had a bearing on whether they would be able to live a peaceful and quiet life. If those in high station came to believe misrepresentations and began to view believers as a threat, this would have had serious consequences. They could have faced having their possessions plundered, being beaten, imprisoned, and even killed. If, however, rulers had the opportunity to hear the truth about Christ’s disciples, they would have been in a better position to make just decisions when opposers misrepresented or falsely accused them. So the prayers for rulers had a desirable object in view. It was in the best interests of believers to be able to enjoy peace and quiet, being left undisturbed to pursue a godly life and to aid others to learn about God’s means of deliverance from sin and condemnation. Without having to face governmental opposition, they would find it much easier to live in a godly manner and with seriousness or with the dignity associated with those who act responsibly. (2:2)
“This [is] good and acceptable before our Savior, God.” Numerous manuscripts link this phrase to what precedes it with the conjunction “for” (gar). The words may be understood to mean that praying for all people is good and pleasing in God’s sight or that living a peaceful and quiet life with all godliness and dignity is good and acceptable to him. As the author of the arrangement for deliverance from sin and condemnation, God is the Savior. (2:3)
It is God’s will that “all men” or all people be saved and reconciled to him and come to a knowledge of the truth. This truth pertains to Christ and how through him all people can be forgiven of their sins and become God’s approved children. The truth of the good news that Paul proclaimed about the Son of God stood in sharp contrast to the falsehoods that certain ones in Ephesus were promoting. (2:4)
That believers would pray for all people regardless of their station in life is only right, for there is but one God and one mediator between God and humans. The “man Christ Jesus,” in his capacity as mediator, effects a reconciliation with his Father of all who put faith in him. (2:5)
The basis for his mediatory function is his sacrificial death. “He gave himself a ransom for all.” Upon surrendering his life, Jesus Christ ransomed or bought the entire human race, making it possible for all who accepted this arrangement in faith to be forgiven of their sins and to be reconciled to God. The testimony concerning this was to be made known in its “own time.” After Jesus’ death and resurrection, the time came for this witness to be given, urging people everywhere to repent of their sins and to accept the ransom price he had paid for them. (2:6; for other meanings regarding the “testimony,” see the Notes section.)
For the purpose of bearing witness, Paul was divinely appointed as a proclaimer and an apostle (one sent forth to make known the message about Christ). He solemnly affirmed his being a proclaimer and an apostle, saying, “I speak the truth, I am not lying.” Then he identified himself as a “teacher of nations in faith and truth.” Paul taught people of the nations about faith in God and Christ and made known the truth about them, conveying everything that was needed for individuals to become part of the family of God’s beloved children. (2:7; see the Notes section.)
At this point, the apostle again directed attention to matters pertaining to the community of believers. When believers assembled in various places, Paul wanted men to do the praying, “raising holy hands without wrath and disputes.” One of the attitudes assumed when praying was to raise the arms with open palms as would a suppliant. The men who prayed should be able to do so with “holy hands” or hands that did not have the stain of sin. Moreover, they should be at peace with fellow believers, not harboring anger or being involved in controversies or debates. (2:8; see the Notes section.)
The Greek term for “woman” (gyné) can also mean “wife.” Therefore, Paul’s comments may either be understood as applying to women generally or more specifically to wives. When assembling with fellow believers, they were to comport themselves in keeping with what society commonly expected from exemplary women or wives when they entered the public sphere. They were not to attract undue attention to themselves by the way they clothed or adorned themselves. Instead, believing women or wives were to dress modestly and sensibly, avoiding expensive apparel, gold ornamentation or pearls, or braiding their hair to form intricate or attention-getting designs. (2:9; see the Notes section.)
Their attire should reveal to observers that it was becoming for women who, by engaging in good works, were committed to godliness. These “good works” would include extending hospitality to strangers, helping the needy, and caring well for the family. (Compare Acts 9:36, 39; 1 Timothy 5:10; Titus 2:4, 5.) Additionally, by not flaunting wealth, believing women would avoid giving the appearance of elevating themselves above the more numerous fellow believers with limited means, including slaves. All were members of just one family of God’s beloved children. (2:10)
In the congregation, a wife or woman would not be disruptive or put herself forward, but her role would be that of a learner or quiet listener “in all submissiveness.” This would harmonize with the subordinate place of women in the family arrangement, where the husband occupied the position of household head. (2:11)
As to teaching publicly in the congregation, Paul continued, “I do not allow a woman [or wife] to teach nor to have authority over a man, but to be quiet.” It would have been contrary to the sense of modesty and propriety for a woman to step out of her role as a wife under her husband’s headship and to instruct him and other husbands publicly. In the public sphere, she would be a quiet or a respectful listener. (2:12) Whereas Paul taught that believing men and women had an equal standing before God as his beloved “sons” or children, he did not mean for the arrangement of headship in the family to cease nor did he intend for this to change the distinct cultural roles of men and women in the public sphere.
The apostle based his stand concerning the role of women on what he recognized as precedents contained in the book of Genesis. “Adam was formed first; then Eve.” By reason of his priority of existence, Adam occupied the position of a teacher, one from whom his wife learned. (2:13) Upon acting independently of her husband as head, she was deceived regarding the forbidden fruit and transgressed the divine command. Adam, on the other hand, was not deceived, but “listened” to his wife, choosing to heed her words to join her in disobeying God’s command. In the Genesis account, Eve alone is represented as having been deceived, for only she is quoted as saying that the serpent had deceived her. Adam made no reference to having been deceived by Eve but is quoted as saying, “The woman whom you gave [to be] with me, she gave me [fruit] from the tree, and I ate.” (2:14; Genesis 3:12, 13, 17)
It appears that the apostle still had thoughts from the Genesis account in mind when he added, “But she will be saved through childbearing, if they remain in faith and love and holiness [along] with propriety [sophrosýne].” The judgment pronounced on Eve involved childbearing and the difficulties that would attend it. Seemingly, Paul saw in this aspect the role of women in the home. Being occupied with raising children and caring for household affairs, a woman would be “saved,” possibly meaning delivered or protected from taking a course that would be spiritually injurious to her. Later in this letter, Paul encouraged younger widows to marry, raise children, and manage a household. Not having family responsibilities and so being idle, certain young widows had ended up going from house to house as gossips and busybodies, talking about matters that should have been kept private. Some even had experienced spiritual ruin. (5:11-15) “Childbearing,” including all the duties and responsibilities associated with family life, would have saved these widows (had they remarried) from pursuing a wrong course. (2:15)
Possibly the singular “she will be saved” is a collective singular, and the qualification for being saved, which is expressed as a plural verb (“if they remain”), could apply to women as individuals. Women would be saved or delivered from situations that could cause them to fall, provided they continued to maintain their faith in God and Christ, manifested love in their interactions with others, and lived holy or pure lives. The Greek term rendered “propriety” can denote “soundness of mind,” “reasonableness,” “moderation,” or “decency.” In this context, it appears to designate the kind of conduct and bearing that is associated with good judgment and moderation. (2:15)
Notes:
The concluding phrase of verse 6 is elliptical. As a result, the words have been variously understood. One interpretation is that Christ gave his life as a ransom so that he, at God’s appointed time, confirmed that God desires to save all. According to another view, Christ’s surrendering his life was confirmed to all at God’s appointed time.
Translations vary considerably in the meaning their renderings of verse 6 convey. “He [Christ Jesus] is proof that came at the right time.” (NCV) Christ Jesus “sacrificed himself to win freedom for all mankind, revealing God’s purpose at God’s good time.” (REB) “He [Christ Jesus] gave himself to rescue all of us. God showed us this at the right time.” (CEV) “He gave himself as a ransom for us all — an act of redemption which happened once, but which stands for all time as a witness to what he is.” (J. B. Phillips)
With reference to Paul’s speaking the truth (in verse 7), numerous manuscripts include “in Christ.”
In verse 8, the conjunction “therefore” (oun) links the expression of Paul’s desire respecting prayer with his having been appointed as a proclaimer and an apostle to people of the nations, making known God’s purpose for humans to be delivered from sin and condemnation. The connection appears to be that, in view of the apostle’s universal commission, all “men” or all people are rightly the object of prayer.
Both singular and plural forms of the Greek word for “dispute” (in verse 8) are found in extant manuscripts.
The application of Paul’s admonition about attire and adornment (verse 9) also harmonized with what unbelievers would have regarded as exemplary. A work attributed to a female Pythagorean philosopher of the fourth or third century BCE states that a woman should not wear transparent, ornate or silk clothes, but should dress modestly in white. Thus she would not appear overdressed or as a woman given to luxury and would avoid making other women envious. She should not adorn herself with gold or emeralds, for these are costly and manifest arrogance toward women of limited means.
In the first century CE, the Roman statesman and philosopher Seneca, in a personal letter to his mother, praised her for not being impressed by jewels or pearls and for refusing to wear immodest clothing that would have “exposed no greater nakedness” upon being removed. He added, “Your only ornament, the kind of beauty that time does not tarnish, is the great honor of modesty.”
The Jewish philosopher Philo (c. 20 BCE to c. 50 CE) drew a distinction between the public sphere of men and the private sphere of women, and then indicated that a respectable woman would not want to be seen “going about like a woman who walks the streets in the sight of other men.” (Special Laws, III, 169-171)
The opening words (“trustworthy [is] the word”) may either affirm that a woman would be “saved through childbearing” or serve to introduce the declaration that the man who “strives for overseership desires a good work.” An “overseer” or “superintendent” in a congregation had the responsibility of looking after the spiritual interests of fellow believers as would a loving guardian. In times of persecution, overseers would be prime targets, often facing imprisonment, torture, and death. Possibly, because of the grave dangers they faced, Paul stressed that overseership was a good work (not a responsibility to be avoided out of fear). (3:1)
Only men of the highest moral character could be entrusted with the assignment of looking after the spiritual well-being of fellow believers. Paul provided Timothy with guidelines about the qualifications he should look for in men who could serve in this capacity. An overseer should be “blameless” or free from reproach. His conduct and dealings with others should not give rise to questions but should reflect adherence to the loftiest moral standards. (3:2; see the Notes section.)
A man’s being the “husband of one wife” could be variously understood. In the Greco-Roman world, polygamy existed and divorce could be obtained on various grounds. It was not uncommon for married men to have mistresses. So the meaning could be that a man should have only one living wife and be faithful to her. The strictest application would be to take the words to mean that a man who had married a second time should not be considered for appointment as an overseer. While various interpretations are possible, the primary thought appears to be that Timothy should not have considered as suitable any man whose married life was not or had not been exemplary. (3:2)
A man who could serve as an overseer should be “sober” (nephálios), “sensible” (sóphron), “orderly” (kósmios), “hospitable,” and able to teach. (3:2)
The Greek term nephálios can describe a person who is moderate, temperate, or sober. Often the expression relates to one who is moderate in the use of wine. The matter of moderation in drink is mentioned later (in verse 3), and so nephálios may here apply to the use of restraint, not being given to extremes or excesses of any kind. (3:2)
A person to whom the Greek word sóphron is applied would be sensible, thoughtful, or give evidence of possessing good judgment. One whom the Greek expression kósmios describes would be orderly, respectable, dignified, or proper in bearing and in handling daily affairs. (3:2)
The Greek term for “hospitable” is philóxenos and denotes showing love for strangers. Followers of Christ who were commended for their love of strangers opened their homes to fellow believers whom they did not know personally and treated them as welcome guests. (3:2; Philemon 7; 3 John 5-8)
Men who were qualified to teach would have understood the truth about God and Christ and would have been able to convey this to others, providing sound admonition and instruction. (3:2)
Those who would serve as overseers should not overindulge in drinking wine but should be setting an example in moderation. Heavy drinking often leads to fights and brawling, which would also disqualify a man from serving. (3:3)
Overseers should not be violent men who bully others or are quick to come to blows, but they should be gentle, forbearing, tolerant, or courteous. Instead of insisting on the letter of the law, these men would be able to look at matters humanely and understandingly. They would be peaceable, not contentious. (3:3; see the Notes section.)
Overseers must be free from the love of money (literally, “love of silver”). They would be known as honest men who conscientiously paid their debts and did not participate in questionable business practices or deals. (3:3)
A married overseer would be a man who commendably directed, managed, and cared for his own household. His children would be submissive to him, conducting themselves in a laudable manner. They would not be debauched youths. The words “with all dignity” (seriousness or respect) could either relate to the conduct of the children or to the manner in which the father managed the household. Both meanings are found in translations. (3:4) “He must manage his own household well, keeping his children submissive and respectful in every way.” (NRSV) “He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect.” (NIV) “He must have proper authority in his own household, and be able to control and command the respect of his children.” (J. B. Phillips) “He must be one who manages his own household well and controls his children without losing his dignity.” (REB)
If a man is unable to manage or care well for his own household, he would hardly be able to look after a community of fellow believers. A father has more authority in his own family than he would among members of the household of faith. Additionally, natural affection in the family serves as an additional bond. So if a man had difficulty in caring for his own household, he would find it much harder to look after the spiritual well-being of a congregation, where his authority would not be as great and where fewer ties of natural affection existed. (3:5)
A neophyte or a recent convert would not be qualified to serve as an overseer. Such a man could begin to think more of himself than he should, becoming puffed up with conceit. His false view of his own importance could result in a ruinous fall and the condemnatory judgment passed on the devil. Another meaning (conveyed in a number of translations) is that the individual would experience the adverse judgment that the devil desired to be expressed against him. (3:6)
An overseer needed to have “good” or favorable “testimony” from persons outside the community of believers. Among persons acquainted with him, he should have a good reputation. There should not be anything in his past that would raise serious questions about his moral character. If he did not have a reputable standing in the community where he lived, the result would most likely be that he would “fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.” Upon hearing that the man had weighty responsibility in the community of believers, unbelievers would begin making unfavorable and even slanderous remarks, making him an object of reproach. The “snare of the devil” could refer to the trap into which the devil fell (“sharing Satan’s downfall” [J. B. Phillips] or the trap the devil set (“trapped and disgraced by the devil” [CEV]). The more likely meaning appears to be the trap the devil sets. The scandal would serve the interests of the adversary, with resultant disgrace to the whole congregation. (3:7)
“Servants” or assistants commonly attended to matters involving the physical well-being of fellow believers. They looked after arrangements to care for widows or others needing help on account of unfavorable circumstances. (3:8; compare Acts 6:1-6; 11:28-30.)
The nature of the services they rendered did not require them to be apt in teaching, but they needed to be trustworthy men with a record of commendable conduct. It was vital for them to have the full confidence of the community of believers. Servants had close contact with fellow believers and personal knowledge about their needs. They had to be impartial when rendering essential aid, not overlooking anyone.
Just as there were qualifications for men who would be appointed to function as overseers, “likewise” those who would be designated as servants or helpers had to meet certain requirements. Servants needed to be “serious” or “dignified” in disposition and bearing, not frivolous in their deportment and not treating important matters lightly. (3:8)
In word, servants needed to be completely truthful, not “double-tongued.” They would not be saying one thing when meaning something entirely different or telling one person one thing and someone else something else. They were to be moderate in the use of wine, not being given to heavy drinking. With reference to money matters, servants were to be exemplary, not avaricious or shamelessly fond of dishonest gain. They would not consider using the service that had been committed to them to profit themselves. (3:8)
The “mystery of the faith” is the mystery that has faith in Christ as its object. God’s purpose to forgive sins and to reconcile humans to himself on the basis of his Son’s surrender of his life had long remained a mystery or had been hidden. Once Jesus came to the earth, died sacrificially, rose from the dead, and returned to his Father, the “mystery” was disclosed, being made known by those who responded in faith to Christ and his death for them. To have a “clean conscience” respecting the “mystery of the faith,” a man would need to be upright, harmonizing his life with the example and teaching of God’s Son. This necessitated that servants be exemplary in attitude, deed, and word, maintaining a conscience that was not defiled by sinful ways. (3:9)
Before men could begin serving, they first needed to be “tested.” There should be unmistakable evidence that they had the required qualities and abilities to be able to serve fellow believers in a praiseworthy manner. Once they had proved themselves as qualified and capable, they could function as servants or assistants, provided no valid accusation could be made against them. (3:10)
The Greek word gyné can either denote “woman” or “wife.” So the reference could be to the wives of men who would be appointed as servants or assistants. If Paul had intended this to apply to wives, one would expect that he would have made similar expressions about the wives of those who would serve as overseers. The mention of “women” appears in a context of appointments to serve fellow believers, and this would seem to weigh against taking the reference to be to wives or women generally. (3:11)
In the letter to the Romans (16:1), Phoebe is called a “servant of the congregation in Cenchreae.” It is not likely that this meant she held the appointed office of a deaconess, but she probably ministered to others in a general sense, rendering valuable service to fellow believers. Paul probably entrusted Phoebe to deliver the letter to the Romans, and she doubtless was asked to performer other services in the community of believers. On the basis of the reference to Phoebe as a “servant,” one might reasonably conclude that, in 1 Timothy, the women would be those who were chosen or asked to perform specific services in or for the congregation. (3:11)
As in the case of men who rendered service (3:8), these women would likewise have to be “serious” or dignified in their deportment. They could not be slanderers, given to gossiping and passing on malicious rumors. As was said of those who would serve as overseers (3:2), the women should be moderate (nephálios), temperate, or sober. Their conduct should be free from any excesses or extremes. They should be “faithful,” trustworthy, or dependable “in everything” (literally, “all,” meaning either in all respects or in all matters). (3:11)
Resuming with the qualifications of men who would serve fellow believers, Paul said, “Servants should be husbands of one wife, managing children and their own households well.” Like overseers (3:4), married servants should be exemplary family men, caring properly for their households. Their being husbands of one wife would have the same significance as in the case of overseers. (3:2) Responsible family men would have the trust and respect of the larger family of faith. In being mentioned in addition to the children, the household would have included more than the immediate family members. This may be an implied indication that servants or assistants had the ability to give good direction to others and were skilled in managing affairs. (3:12)
The conjunction “for” (gar) seems to link the commendable position of servants in their own families and their entire household to a positive result in the community of believers. When serving fellow believers well as exemplary family heads, they gain a good standing for themselves and “much boldness in the faith that [is] in Christ Jesus.” Their being good family men and caring well for the needs of fellow believers in their capacity as servants would gain them the respect, trust, and appreciation of the congregation. In handling their responsibilities within the community of believers, such good servants would have “boldness,” not having their self-confidence undermined on account of failing to manage household affairs properly. “Boldness in the faith that [is] in Christ Jesus” may refer to the faith that is focused on the Son of God. Therefore, within the family of fellow believers, exemplary servants or assistants would have confidence in speaking and caring for essential matters. There is a possibility that “faith that [is] in Christ Jesus” refers to the faith in his Father that he manifested while on earth. In that case, a man’s serving well in the community of believers would be an expression of the kind of faith Jesus Christ exemplified. (3:13)
Paul hoped that he would shortly be able to join Timothy in Ephesus. In the event his intention did not materialize and he was delayed, he had written what he did so that Timothy would know how to conduct himself in the community of believers. The apostle referred to this community as the “congregation of the living God, a pillar and support of the truth.” It is God’s congregation, for he purchased it with the blood of his own Son. (Acts 20:28) As a pillar, the congregation upholds the truth, specifically the message concerning Christ and what his Father made possible through him. This would require that the members individually function as defenders and upholders of the truth that the community of believers shared in common. A “support” is a foundation or a firm basis. With the individual members adhering closely to it, the truth is supported as if resting on a solid foundation. (3:14, 15)
Paul continued, “And confessedly great is the mystery of godliness: [He] was manifested in flesh, justified in spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory.” Like the “truth” and the “mystery of faith,” the “mystery of godliness” is summed up in Christ. God’s purpose always had been to have humans be at one with him through his Son, but that purpose remained hidden or secret for generations until it was revealed in the first century CE. (3:16)
The “godliness” associated with this mystery may be the godliness that distinguishes the lives of those who put faith in Christ. He is the object of the revealed mystery, which is confessedly or undeniably “great,” giving rise to admiration and wonder. The aspects about the “mystery” are expressed poetically, suggesting that they were part of an early Christian composition. (3:16; see the Notes section.)
God’s unique Son was revealed in the flesh, living as a man on earth. His being justified or vindicated “in spirit” may refer to his having been raised from the dead through the operation of the holy spirit and thus vindicated as truly being God’s Son. (3:16; compare Romans 1:4; Ephesians 1:17-20.)
The Greek word ángelos can designate either a heavenly or a human messenger. At the time Jesus rose from the dead, angels did see him. (Matthew 28:2-6; Mark 16:5; Luke 24:4; John 20:12) If the reference is to human messengers, these would have been all who saw the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ, enabling them to be witnesses to his having been raised from the dead. (3:16)
Christ’s disciples proclaimed the message about him to the people of the nations. In the world of mankind, individuals responded, coming to believe that Jesus Christ is indeed God’s Son. At the time of his ascension to heaven, he was taken up in glory. He was then in the highly exalted state of the one to whom his Father had granted all authority in heaven and on earth. (Matthew 28:18) While on earth, God’s Son had been in a state of humiliation, but he returned to the heavenly realm in a state of matchless glory or magnificence as the Lord of angels and all humans, both living and dead. (3:16; Philippians 2:9-11)
Notes:
The Greek words for “overseer” and “servant” (3:2, 8) are not to be understood as designating “church offices” or “church positions” in the sense that the terms “bishop,” “deacon,” and “deaconess” are understood today. In the first-century congregations, “overseer” and “servant” were not titles designating an office but were descriptive of the work or service the individual performed.
In verse 3, certain manuscripts add “not avaricious [me aischrokerdé],” or shamelessly fond of dishonest gain.
The Greek word for “serious” (semnós) is missing in a few manuscripts, including the original text of fourth-century Codex Sinaiticus.
In 3:16, the reading “confessedly great” has the best manuscript support. A few manuscripts read, “we confess as great.”
The first word following “mystery of godliness” and which has the best manuscript support is hós, meaning “who.” Other manuscripts read hó (which) or theós (God). Copyists may have chosen to correct hós, changing it to the neuter pronoun hó to make it agree with the neuter gender of the noun mystérion (mystery). In early manuscripts, theós was commonly abbreviated by omitting the vowels. As a result, copyists may have misread the pronoun hós as the abbreviated form of theós. Another possibility is that copyists deliberately changed hós to theós, using the noun that reflected the prevailing theological view regarding Christ.
The “speaking” of the spirit may be understood to refer to the expressions believers with the prophetic gift made when God’s spirit operated upon them. According to the expressly spirit-revealed message, “in later times” some would desert the “faith, taking heed to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons.” “Later times” denote future times, with the length of the period separating the then-present time from the culminating future time not being specified. During the foretold time to come, professed believers would abandon or revolt against the solidly based faith in Christ and begin to pay attention to false and destructive teaching. “Deceitful spirits” would be messages purported to be from a spiritual source but which, though false, would be deceptively plausible or alluring. Instead of being healthful or sound, these teachings would be destructive. They would be “teachings of demons.” Originating from the powers of darkness, these teachings would be morally defiling and ruinous. (4:1)
The corrupting and destructive teaching would be conveyed through the “hypocrisy of speakers of lies.” Teachers of falsehood would appear as innocent and as promoting an elevated life, but their words would be harmful and corrupting. Being themselves defiled, they could not convey anything other than lies. Their hypocrisy included their falsely representing themselves and their teaching as good, whereas the very opposite was the case. They had an impure conscience, one that had become insensitive as if it had been seared with a branding iron. (4:2)
With a desensitized conscience, the teachers of error would not believe that others could be motivated aright by a pure conscience and through the operation of God’s spirit. In their own internally impure state, they would seek to impose rules and regulations on others. They would forbid marriage and the eating of certain foods. (4:2, 3)
Teachers of falsehood did not recognize that God had created these foods to be partaken of with thanksgiving by those who have faith and know the “truth.” In the case of believers, their faith in God and Christ is evident from conduct that is consistent with faith. Their knowing the truth about God and Christ would include their knowing what they approve. As persons who have faith and know the truth, believers are prompted to thank God for their sustenance. (4:3)
Thanksgiving is fitting, “because every creation of God [is] good, and nothing is to be rejected [when] received with thanksgiving.” The Genesis account (1:4-31) indicates that God acknowledged his creative works as good. Therefore, humans should not regard as bad what God considers as good. Everything that he has declared to be good is acceptable when partaken of with thanksgiving. (4:4)
God’s word, or the revealed expression of his provision for human sustenance, sanctifies food, setting it apart as acceptable. Additionally, prayer functions as part of the sanctification process. Through prayer, believers acknowledge the food as a gift from God, treating it as something set apart by him for their use. They are appreciative, not eating as do unreasoning animals that are incapable of acknowledging God as the generous provider of everything. (4:5)
By calling to the attention of the “brothers” or fellow believers in Ephesus the things Paul had mentioned, Timothy would be a “good servant of Christ Jesus, nourished by words of faith and the good teaching” that he had followed. “Words of faith” would be the words contained in the then-existing “holy writings” and the message about Christ. These words promoted and strengthened faith or trust in God and his Son, providing essential nourishment for Timothy’s spiritual life. The good teaching he had followed would have included what he had learned from his godly mother and grandmother, from the community of believers where he grew up, and from Paul. (Compare Acts 16:1, 2; 2 Timothy 1:5; 3:10; 14, 15.) This teaching, to which Timothy had faithfully adhered, also served as spiritual nourishment. Having been nourished on wholesome spiritual food (and not the unhealthful teachings of the promoters of error), he was properly equipped for service in Christ’s cause. (4:6)
As a good servant of Christ Jesus, Timothy was to avoid profane myths and the kind of myths that old women who are lacking in sound judgment are prone to relate. Timothy would have known the type of myths, legends, or speculative accounts Paul had in mind, but we today do not. At any rate, these myths would have been destructive or seriously distracting elements in relation to faith in God and Christ. They would have been completely valueless for providing fellow believers with sound teaching or for Timothy’s progress as a devoted servant of Christ. Besides urging Timothy to shun worthless myths, Paul admonished him to train (gymnázo) himself in godliness. (4:7)
In the literal sense, the Greek term gymnázo refers to performing gymnastic exercises or athletic training in the nude. Such training required great physical effort and discipline. Accordingly, for Timothy to continue training himself in godliness, or for a life that honored God and Christ, would have required personal exertion and self-discipline. (4:7)
Timothy’s strenuous exertion would be worth the effort, “for bodily training is useful for a little, but godliness is useful for all things, holding promise for the life now and the one to come.” The exertion and discipline associated with bodily training can contribute to physical well-being, but any derived benefits are limited to the present life. The benefits from a life of godliness and the efforts associated with it are far greater. Faithful adherence to the example and teaching of God’s Son gives one a clean conscience and promotes inner joy, well-being, and contentment. The present life comes to be the best possible, for the godly person has the assurance of God’s loving care and strengthening aid regardless of the circumstances. Even now the godly person is in possession of the eternal life or the real life distinguished by an enduring relationship with the Son of God and his Father. The life to come is the one to be enjoyed in the sinless state, which is accompanied by all the privileges and blessings that will be granted to God’s beloved children. (4:8)
The “word” about the excelling value of godliness is trustworthy or dependable and deserves to be accepted fully. (4:9) On account of the superior benefits resulting from godliness, Paul (using the first person plural either as an editorial “we” or as a reference to himself and his fellow workers) added, “for this we are laboring and struggling, because we have set our hope on the living God, who is the Savior of all men, especially of believers [persons having faith].” In living a life that reflected favorably on God and Christ and discharging his commission as an apostle, Paul worked hard and struggled, often doing so in the face of troubles, obstacles, and hardships. (4:10; see the Notes section.)
He was able to exert himself vigorously even in unfavorable situations because he trusted the living God and knew that his hope rested on a solid foundation. Whereas the lifeless deities that were revered in the Greco-Roman world could do nothing for their worshipers, Paul knew that the hope that rested on the living God was certain of fulfillment. The hope involved the enjoyment of the fullness of salvation or deliverance, being completely liberated from the sinful state and coming to enjoy the inheritance God has in store for his approved children. (4:10)
Salvation or deliverance is a certainty, for God is the Savior of “all men” or all humans. His arrangement for freeing humans from sin and condemnation and coming to be his reconciled children through his Son is available to everyone. The reality of his being the Savior of all is evident in the lives of those who put faith in his Son. God is especially their Savior, for they have accepted the arrangement that is available to all humans. (4:10)
Paul wanted Timothy to make the directives he had given him the basis for imparting commands and teaching to the community of believers in Ephesus. (4:11) To avoid having anyone look down on him because of his youth, Timothy would have needed to conduct himself in an exemplary manner, giving no one occasion for legitimate faultfinding and attributing flaws to his being an immature young man. Therefore, Paul admonished him to be an example to believers “in word” or speech; “in conduct,” or in the way he carried out his responsibilities; “in love,” demonstrating active concern and care for others and putting their interests ahead of his own; “in faith” (not just in expressing his belief but by acting in harmony with it), and “in chastity,” maintaining moral purity or cleanness in all respects. (4:12; see the Notes section.)
Until he would be joining him, Paul desired that Timothy devote himself to reading, to giving admonition, comfort, or encouragement, and to teaching. For the most part, believers benefited from the holy writings and the letters sent to the congregation by hearing them read. This made it especially important for Timothy to be accurate in his reading and conveying the correct meaning through proper emphasis and pausing. Applying himself to admonition would have included providing an exposition based on what he would have read. The exposition would have served to encourage, to comfort, or to exhort the hearers. When teaching, Timothy would have endeavored to make proper application of the holy writings and to aid the listeners to understand what they heard. (4:13)
It appears that at the time of his being designated as Paul’s traveling companion, Timothy received a “gift.” This graciously bestowed divine gift made it possible for him to discharge his future responsibilities. One aspect of this gift could have been the ability to discern true teaching from false. Timothy’s really knowing the truth about God and Christ would have made it possible for him to protect fellow believers from error and harmful influences. (4:14)
Paul urged Timothy not to neglect the gift, which would require that he use it for the benefit of the community of believers. This gift had been given to him “through prophecy with the laying on of hands by the presbyterate” or the body of elders. Certain prophetic words must have been spoken at the time the body of elders laid their hands on Timothy. Likely the prophecy indicated the divine purpose for him and how he would serve. Through the laying on of the elders’ hands, Timothy was appointed or designated for special service. (4:14)
The things on which Paul wanted Timothy to meditate or to reflect would have been the responsibilities associated with his appointment and his personal conduct. The elliptical words (“in these [matters] be”) may serve to reemphasize that Timothy be fully taken up by what his service in Christ’s cause involved. These things should have been his whole life, or the object of his undivided attention. (4:15)
Fully devoted to carrying out his sacred trust, Timothy would have continued to make progress in his walk of faith and in caring well for his responsibilities as a servant to fellow believers. “All,” or every observer, should then have been able to recognize that he was making advancement in all aspects of his life. (4:15; see the Notes section.)
Paul exhorted Timothy to give heed to himself, or the way he conducted himself, and his teaching. This meant that he had to make sure that his conduct harmonized with his teaching. Moreover, what he taught needed to be solidly based on the truth about God and his Son. Sound teaching should have served to strengthen the faith of fellow believers and to help them grow as spiritual persons, progressively coming to be more like Jesus Christ. (4:16)
The admonition “stay in them” may relate to maintaining exemplary conduct and imparting sound teaching. By faithfully carrying out the service that had been entrusted to him, he would save himself and those who listened to him. When diligently cooperating with the guidance of God’s spirit in living an exemplary life and in conveying God’s word or message when teaching, Timothy would be “saving” himself. This is because he would be keeping himself free from attitudes, words, and deeds that would merit divine disapproval. Similarly, those who listened to him, responding to the sound teaching, would be strengthened in their faith and their determination to follow the leading of God’s spirit in all their conduct. They would avoid pursuing a course that would meet with divine disapproval. Instead, they would save themselves by living their lives as persons whom God, through his Son, had saved or delivered from sin and condemnation. (4:16)
Notes:
In verse 10, manuscripts read either agonizómetha (struggling) or oneidizómetha (are reproached).
After agápe (love), in 4:12, numerous manuscripts add, “in spirit.”
In verse 15, numerous manuscripts read “in all,” meaning that Timothy should be making progress “in all things.” The oldest extant manuscripts, however, do not include “in,” and thus represent the progress as being seen by “all” or everyone.
The community of believers is a spiritual family, and Paul instructed Timothy to treat the individual believers as he would beloved family members. The Greek word presbýteros can designate a man who functions as an elder in the congregation. In this context, however, the term apparently denotes an older man. In keeping with his age as a young man (possibly in his thirties), Timothy should appeal to older men as fathers, not denouncing them or expressing disapproval in a manner that would be disrespectful toward them as older persons. His bearing and expressions should reflect how he would speak to his own father. When exhorting younger men, Timothy was to treat them as brothers, not taking liberties with them. (5:1)
In his interactions with older women, Timothy should approach them as he would his own mother. With younger sisters, he should conduct himself chastely as he would with his own sisters. (5:2)
Widows “who are truly widows” would be women who were totally bereft, having no children or grandchildren who could look after them in their declining years. These widows would be “honored” by having provisions made for them to receive aid from the community of believers. (5:3)
In the case of a widow with living descendants, her children or grandchildren should “first learn godliness in their own household.” Their learning godliness would be by assuming the responsibility of caring for needy mothers or grandmothers, repaying them for having benefited from the help they received as young children. Their doing so is acceptable to God, for it harmonizes with his command to honor parents. (5:4)
A completely destitute widow, with no children or grandchildren to help her, relied fully on God. In her needy state, she rested her hope or full trust in God as her helper and sustainer. For her daily necessities, she persisted in praying and supplicating him with the intensity comparable to that of a needy beggar. Her continuing “in supplications and prayers night and day” is indicative of her doing so at every opportunity. Her appeals would not have been limited to requests for herself but would doubtless have included prayers for the whole community of fellow believers. In recognizing her full dependence on God and the provisions he would make for her through human agencies, such a widow manifested a spiritual outlook. She committed all her cares to him. (5:5)
Unlike such a godly widow, the one who indulges (spataláo) herself is dead though she is living. The Greek term (spataláo) is descriptive of living luxuriously, voluptuously, or in a highly indulgent manner. A widow whose life could be so described would be one who pampered herself and was primarily focused on satisfying her personal desires. She thus missed the whole purpose of living. The real life is distinguished by an enduring relationship with God and Christ and is lived for them. It is a life that honors God and his Son. A self-indulgent widow would be devoid of such a life and so, although alive physically, would be dead. (5:6)
The apostle’s next words (“and these [things] enjoin, that they may be irreproachable”) may be variously understood. They could relate to the directive for children and grandchildren to care for widows in their families. By discharging this duty, they would keep themselves free from rightfully being censured for neglecting their own mothers and grandmothers. Another possibility is that the commands to be given are the guidelines that follow regarding widows. A number of translations contain interpretive renderings that are more explicit than the Greek text. (5:7) “Add these instructions to the rest, so that the widows may be above reproach.” (REB) “You should therefore make the following rules for the widows, to avoid abuses:” (J. B. Phillips) “Tell the believers to do these things so that no one can criticize them.” (NCV) “Tell all of this to everyone, so they will do the right thing.” (CEV)
A refusal to care for needy ones in one’s own family or household would constitute a disowning of the faith and make one worse than a person without faith or than an unbeliever. Faith in God and Christ is more than an expression of belief. It is a way of life that harmonizes with the example and teaching of God’s Son. Shortly before he died, Jesus arranged that Mary (who must have been a widow by then) be cared for. (John 19:26, 27) The compassionate concern he exemplified during the course of his ministry on earth and the superlative expression of his love in surrendering his life revealed the kind of selfless love his disciples must have. Therefore, disregard for the needs of one’s own, especially members of one’s household (such as a widowed mother or grandmother), is very serious. This neglect would make professed believers worse than loveless unbelievers who have not been enlightened by the example and teaching of God’s Son. (5:8)
For widows who would be receiving aid from the community of believers, Paul set forth specific requirements. They should not be under sixty years of age, and so they were to be beyond an age where remarriage would have been likely. A woman’s having been the “wife of one husband” would indicate that she had been faithful to him and that his death had left her totally bereft. (5:9)
Widows who would be listed to receive aid from the congregation were to have a reputation for commendable works. This would have eliminated any doubts about the rightness of the congregation’s assuming the care of an aged widow. Fellow believers would have felt good about compassionately looking after a woman who had formerly attended to the needs of others. Her praiseworthy deeds (to which others could testify) would have included caring well for children, welcoming strangers into her home, washing their feet and providing meals for them. The washing of the feet of “holy ones” (fellow believers) would have been a kind gesture of hospitality. When traveling, bare feet in sandals became dusty, and it would have been refreshing to have one’s feet washed after having done extensive walking. (5:10)
Regarding a widow who would be put on the congregation’s list, Paul continued with the requirements, “if she assisted the afflicted, if she devoted herself to every good work.” While in a position to do so, she would have responded to the needs of others, doing what she could to relieve their distress. Every good work would have included everything associated with caring well for the family, extending hospitality, and generously giving of her time and effort in helping those in need. (5:10; compare Acts 9:36, 39.)
Exemplary older women who were on the congregation’s list to receive assistance would also have been rendering service for fellow believers. Their prayers for the community of believers were valuable in the eyes of God. (Compare Luke 2:36, 37.) The service of these older widows doubtless included teaching younger women how to conduct themselves as mothers and wives in a manner that would bring praise and honor to God and Christ. (Compare Titus 2:3-5.)
That a widow’s being on the list included both assistance from and service to the community of believers is evident from what Paul next said about younger widows. The younger widows were not to be enrolled, as their strong desire for marriage and family life could seriously affect their relationship to Christ, resulting in their disregarding their “first faith.” In this context, the “first faith” appears to designate the initial promise to serve the congregation and thus to make themselves more serviceable to Christ. When failing to follow through, the young widows would come under adverse judgment (either divine disapproval or human censure). (5:11, 12; see the Notes section.)
Distracted by their personal desires and not being fully devoted to advancing Christ’s cause, younger widows became accustomed to being idle. With too much time at their disposal, they would go about from one house to another as gossipers and busybodies, talking about things that should not have been mentioned. (5:13)
In view of the problems that certain young widows had caused because of having become idle, Paul recommended that they get married, have children, and keep busy in caring for a household. As exemplary wives and mothers attending to family affairs, they would not give the “adversary” occasion for reviling them for disreputable behavior. Likely the adversary would be anyone who opposed Christ’s disciples and resorted to any means possible to malign them. (5:14; see the Notes section for another explanation.)
Paul already knew about some young widows who had turned aside from a divinely approved course to follow Satan. By their words and actions, they must have brought great reproach on the community of believers. In thus also dishonoring God and Christ, they would have come to be on Satan’s side. (5:15)
A believing woman might have relatives who were widows. It would be her responsibility to care for their needs. The congregation would then not be burdened with this obligation but could give full attention to assist widows who were “truly widows” (those with no relatives to assist them). (5:16; see the Notes section.)
Elders who ministered well to fellow believers deserved “double honor.” In being designated as “double,” this honor includes more than the honor or respect accorded to everyone in the community of believers. As in the case of aged widows, honor would include their receiving the congregation’s assistance in caring for their physical needs. Especially the elders who labored “in word and teaching” would have appropriately been the recipients of aid. The time and effort required to speak to and to teach fellow believers meant that these elders had less time and energy for devoting themselves to working for life’s necessities. (5:17)
With a quotation from Deuteronomy 25:4 (LXX), Paul backed up his admonition to honor elders by assisting them to meet their physical needs. “You must not muzzle a threshing bovine.” When threshing, the animal would be able to benefit from its labor. It would not be tormented by being prevented from partaking of the threshed grain. Additionally, the apostle drew on Jesus’ words (Luke 10:7), “The worker deserves his wages.” (Compare 1 Corinthians 9:6-14.) Accordingly, when laboring for fellow believers, elders would be treated honorably by being compensated materially. (5:18)
In view of their labors in the congregation and the resultant visibility, elders came under closer scrutiny than did other believers. This also meant that a greater likelihood existed that someone would find fault with something an elder said or did. In order that elders might not be subjected to frivolous or unfounded accusations, Paul advised that Timothy only consider accusations that two or three witnesses could confirm, basing this on the words of Deuteronomy 19:15 (LXX). If an elder would then be found guilty of wrongdoing, he should be reproved before everyone present. This served to instill a wholesome fear in all who heard the reproof, causing them to reflect on their own course of life and to strive to live in a manner that honored God and Christ. (5:19, 20; compare Paul’s reproof of Peter [Galatians 2:11-14].)
Handling situations involving accusations would have been an especially weighty responsibility for Timothy, and Paul charged him to judge impartially, saying, “I adjure you before God and Christ Jesus and the chosen angels to observe these [instructions] without prejudgment, doing nothing according to an inclination [of partiality].” In this solemn manner, Paul reminded Timothy that God, Christ, and the angels who look after the interests of the community of believers would be fully aware of how he followed through on his instructions when handling matters in the congregation. Timothy’s judgments were to be impartial and unbiased, based on careful examination and evaluation of the facts. (5:21)
When appointing a man to serve fellow believers, laying his hands upon him, Timothy needed to avoid acting hastily or prematurely. An unqualified man could do great harm to the community of believers. The sins such an unfit man might commit would, in part, be attributable to Timothy’s having acted hastily or without sufficient care in evaluating the individual’s qualifications. He would then become a sharer in that one’s sins. Only exemplary men were to serve in the community of believers, and Timothy had to keep himself chaste or blameless in caring for this and other matters. (5:22)
Possibly the stress from the weighty responsibilities that rested on Timothy contributed to health problems. Additionally, the water to which he had access would not always have been fit to drink. Therefore, the apostle advised him not to drink water but to drink a little wine for the sake of his stomach and his frequent bouts with sickness. (5:23)
Again focusing on the matter of choosing men to serve fellow believers, Paul added a caution about the need for sufficient time for making evaluations. In the case of some men, their “sins,” wrongs, or serious flaws are evident to everyone even before a judgment is rendered. Other men’s sins or faults are not readily apparent but become manifest later. Likewise the good works of certain men may be evident to everyone, their exemplary life being acknowledged and undisputed. While this may not always be the case, eventually good works do come to light. They cannot be kept hidden, and so the passage of time would reveal which men would be qualified to serve. (5:24, 25)
Notes:
The Greek text of verses 11 and 12 is less specific than the renderings of modern translations. A literal translation would be, “But reject younger widows; for whenever they become sensuous of [away from] Christ, they want to marry, having a judgment because they disregarded the first faith.” The Greek verb that conveys the thought of becoming sensuous is katastreniáo, and here appears to designate being impelled by a strong physical desire for the security of a home and family. This desire overrides devotion to Christ and leads to failure to follow through on the “first faith.”
Translations vary in representing what happens to younger widows in relation to Christ and the nature of their “first faith.” “But do not put younger widows on that list. After they give themselves to Christ, they are pulled away from him by their physical needs, and then they want to marry again. They will be judged for not doing what they first promised to do.” (NCV) “Don’t put young widows on the list. They may later have a strong desire to get married. Then they will turn away from Christ and become guilty of breaking their promise to him.” (CEV) “Do not accept young widows because if their natural desires distract them from Christ, they want to marry again, and then people condemn them for being unfaithful to their original promise.” (NJB) “Do not admit younger widows to the roll; for if they let their passions distract them from Christ’s service they will want to marry again, and so be guilty of breaking their earlier vow to him.” (REB) “Don’t put the younger widows on your list. My experience is that when their natural desires grow stronger than their spiritual devotion to Christ they want to marry again, thus proving themselves unfaithful to their first loyalty.” (J. B. Phillips) “But exclude younger widows, for when their sensuality estranges them from Christ, they want to marry and will incur condemnation for breaking their first pledge.” (NAB)
Paul’s directive regarding young widows does not mean that no help would have been given to those who were in real need. The apostle’s letter related to a specific situation. Young widows would not have been enrolled as women who would be receiving aid and serving the community of believers.
In verse 14, the adversary may be Satan. His reviling could then be understood as taking place through humans as his instruments.
According to another manuscript reading of verse 16, the reference is to a believing man or a believing woman who has widows as relatives.
Slaves, believers under a “yoke of servitude,” were to accord their masters “all honor,” striving not to have “God’s name and the teaching” blasphemed. By being respectful of their owners and exemplary in discharging their duties, slaves would avoid becoming objects of legitimate complaints and displeasure. Masters would then not speak abusively of the God whom their slaves worshiped nor of the way of life that “the teaching,” with its focus on God’s Son, motivated. (6:1)
Slaves with believing owners were not to look down on them, despising them as not having any standing above them as Christ’s disciples. Instead, they should more readily serve them, recognizing that they are benefiting beloved brothers in the same family of faith. The things that Paul wanted Timothy to use as a basis for teaching and exhortation related either to what he had set forth up to this point or the matters he mentioned thereafter. (6:2)
Anyone who taught things other than the “healthful words of our Lord Jesus Christ” and which were not in harmony with the teaching “according to godliness” is described as “conceited” (typhóo), “not understanding anything, but diseased about searchings” or controversial questioning and “fights over words.” (6:3, 4)
Jesus’ words, or the thoughts he expressed, are “healthful” or sound, promoting the well-being of believers. Nothing he said would ever lead anyone into a course of life that would be injurious. His words, when followed, result in lasting benefits. Teaching “according to godliness” designates teaching that serves to motivate those who heed it to live uprightly in harmony with Christ’s example. (6:3)
For the Greek term typhóo, the meaning “conceited” has the support of the Latin Vulgate and the Syriac. The Vulgate renders the word as superbus (conceited, arrogant, insolent, or superb). Typhóo can also signify to be deluded, and ancient Greek writers even used the word to denote being mentally sick. In this context, typhóo may describe a state of being extremely arrogant and deluded. Individuals who fit this description exalt their own ideas above the plain words of Jesus and often resort to bluster and ridicule when trying to persuade others to accept their distortions of the truth. (6:4)
Arrogant and deluded, advocates of error have no understanding of Jesus’ words but perceive them in a distorted manner. These persons are “diseased” in their thinking, raising speculative questions and delving into matters that are pointless. They debate and argue, fighting about the use and significance of words instead of focusing on the message the words as a whole convey. (6:4)
The questionings (“searchings” or “seekings”) and the fights over words breed “envy, strife, blasphemies, evil surmisings” or suspicions and “wrangling.” Often the objects of the envy or jealousy are those who may be more persuasive in their argumentation. Entrenched in their wrong views, advocates of error are given to strife or quarreling. They resort to blasphemy, slander, or abusive words when countering those who reject their wrong opinions. Insisting on the correctness of their twisted views, they look with suspicion on persons who question their position and are quick to assail their reputation on the basis of hearsay and without any verifiable evidence. Teachers of falsehood are so self-deluded that they are willing to wrangle, repeatedly engaging in fierce arguments to defend their unfounded opinions. (6:4, 5)
Paul described the men who engaged in wrangling as “corrupt in mind and despoiled of the truth, supposing godliness to be a means of gain.” These teachers of falsehood were morally corrupt in their thinking and did not possess the truth as Jesus Christ had revealed it through his example and teaching. They were completely deprived of this truth, as if it had been snatched away from them as booty. These corrupt men imagined godliness (in their case, a mere profession of godliness) to be a way to derive gain. This suggests that they used their position as supposed teachers to profit materially or to elicit the admiration and praise of those who accepted their teaching. (6:5; see the Notes section.)
Persons who are truly reverential do not seek to exploit their godliness for any kind of profit. But, in itself, godliness does lead to “great gain” when accompanied by “contentment.” The godly person is content with the basic necessities of life, not yearning for riches or a luxurious lifestyle. Humans enter the world with nothing and, at death, cannot carry anything out with them. Realistically, then, godly persons are content with food, clothing, and adequate shelter, recognizing that all material things are temporary in nature. Their life as godly persons is one of “great gain,” for they enjoy an inner sense of well-being from knowing that God’s loving care, concern, and aid will never be lacking. Their hope of an eternal future as his beloved children is certain of fulfillment. (6:6-8)
“But those who want to be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and many senseless and injurious desires that plunge men into ruin and destruction. For the root of all evils is the love of money [literally, love of silver], by which some, [in] reaching out for [it], were led astray from the faith and pierced themselves with many pains.” (6:9, 10)
Those who make it their aim in life to be rich will soon act out of harmony with a divinely approved course. When the goal to be rich begins to control the life of individuals, they will find themselves tempted to use dishonest or questionable means to accumulate wealth. The longing for riches is ensnaring, for the entire life becomes captive to acquiring money and possessions. Desires that are focused exclusively on obtaining material things are “senseless,” for nothing of a material nature has lasting value. Material things cannot be retained as permanent possessions. The determination to be rich hampers a person’s ability to recognize what has the greatest importance in life. In value, nothing compares with having an approved relationship with God and Christ and being a part of his family of beloved children, wherein genuine friendships flourish. Those who greedily reach out for riches end up hurting themselves and others, sacrificing a good conscience and failing to respond in a compassionate and caring manner to fellow humans. The final result can be spiritual ruin and destruction because of forfeiting a good relationship with the Father and his Son. (6:9; see the Notes section.)
From the standpoint of where it can lead, “the love of money is a root of all evils.” When greediness controls them, persons are willing to do almost anything to obtain money. They may use questionable, fraudulent, or even violent means to acquire it, completely disregarding the harm they are causing to themselves and fellow humans. Paul knew of some in the community of believers who had become entangled by a love for money and, therefore, had ceased living a life of faith in God and his Son. Those who had been “led astray from the faith” experienced “many pains,” as if they had stabbed themselves all over their bodies. Hopelessly ensnared by their love for money, they may have sensed within themselves the emptiness of their lives. For transitory material possessions, they had given up a relationship with God and Christ, a clean conscience, a sense of well-being from an awareness of divine care and help, a loving family of fellow children of God, and a hope of sharing with them in a permanent inheritance. (6:10)
Referring to Timothy as a “man of God” (a man in God’s service who had been granted a special ministry or sacred trust), Paul urged him to “flee from these [things],” as would one in making a speedy escape from a grave danger. Based on the context, “these things” would be the desire for riches and the love of money, and all the injurious things that could result. Instead of a pursuit centered on obtaining temporary possessions, Timothy was to pursue the things that are enduring ― “righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance, gentleness.” These qualities are not the ones that distinguish the conduct of persons who greedily seek to gain riches. (6:11)
Pursuing righteousness means seeking to do what is right, just, or fair. The pursuit of wealth, if not outrightly dishonest, is marked by unfairness toward others. “Godliness” requires that God and Christ be the center of one’s life and not the acquisition of material possessions. In the pursuit of “faith,” Timothy would have endeavored to continue growing in his faith in God and his Son. There is also a possibility that “faith” here denotes trustworthiness, which would have called for Timothy to demonstrate himself to be faithful in discharging his responsibilities. Love is a selfless concern and care for others, and includes a willingness to put the interests of fellow humans ahead of one’s own. This kind of love is woefully lacking among those who are determined to be rich, for they are often callous and even hateful toward the afflicted. To “endure” denotes to bear up patiently under difficult or distressing circumstances. The wealthy, on the other hand, tend to be impatient and demanding, being easily irritated when developments are not according to their liking. In their attitude, the rich may be harsh, overbearing, and demeaning, but Timothy was to be gentle, mild, or meek. (6:11)
Timothy’s fighting the “good fight of the faith” involved his struggling to uphold the faith in God and Christ, defending it and resisting those who would introduce false teachings. He would have needed to keep his own faith strong and pure and to assist the community of believers to do likewise. (6:12)
To take hold of the “eternal life” to which he had been called, Timothy had to maintain a firm grip on his relationship to God and Christ, never letting it slip from him. According to Jesus’ words, eternal life is knowing him and his Father, signifying an enduring relationship with them. Ultimately, believers will enjoy this relationship in the sinless state for all eternity. (John 17:3) Timothy came into possession of the real life, the eternal life, upon putting faith in Jesus Christ, accepting the forgiveness made possible through his sacrificial death, and thereby coming to be reconciled to his Father. (6:12)
Timothy also needed to take hold of the “good confession” that he confessed “before many witnesses.” The “good confession” could refer to the acknowledgment of his faith in God and Christ at the time of his baptism. This confession would have been made in the presence of many witnesses. Another possibility is that he, at the time of his being designated for special service with the apostle Paul, made the expression of faith before numerous witnesses. Timothy’s following through on Paul’s admonition required that he act in harmony with the expression of faith that he had made publicly, continuing to adhere to it without wavering. (6:12)
In a solemn manner, Paul charged Timothy to carry out his commission, declaring his charge to be made “before God, who makes all alive, and Christ Jesus, who [when] testifying to Pontius Pilate, [made] the good confession.” God is the source of life, the sustainer of life, and the restorer of life. Thus Timothy would have been reminded that he was accountable to the Father to whom he owed his life. Moreover, in faithfully carrying out his responsibilities, he would be in the service of the Lord Jesus Christ and was to imitate his example. To Pontius Pilate, Jesus made the “good confession,” declaring that his kingdom was not of this world and that he had come into the world to bear witness to the truth. (6:13; John 18:36, 37)
The “commandment” Paul charged Timothy to keep “spotless” and “irreproachable until the manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ” appears to have related to the directive he had given to him about carrying out his commission. At the time of his return in glory, Jesus Christ would become manifest to all on the earth and his living disciples would be changed, joining him and the believers who had been resurrected immediately upon his arrival. It was Paul’s earnest desire that his beloved fellow worker be found approved at the time of Christ’s manifestation, having fulfilled the command respecting his commission in a spotless and blameless manner. (6:14; 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17)
According to Jesus’ words, only his Father knew the time when the manifestation would take place. (Matthew 24:36; Mark 13:32; Acts 1:6, 7) Christ’s appearance in glory is to occur at the time his Father had predetermined. Reasonably, then, his Father would be the one who would “show” the manifestation in its “own times.” The Father is the “happy” and “only Sovereign,” enjoying an unparalleled state of well-being, contentment, and satisfaction as the Supreme One. Although he has committed the kingship to his Son, the Father remains the Most High and so is the “King of kings and Lord of lords.” None of the deities that have been or are still revered possess immortality. They are, in fact, lifeless. Only the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ is the God who is immortal, dwelling in “unapproachable light, which no man has seen nor can see.” The divine glory is of such a nature that no human would be able to endure the sight. God’s greatness and magnificence is such that Paul rightly ascribed “honor” or dignity and eternal might or dominion to him. The apostle concluded the prayerful expression with “amen” (so be it). (6:15, 16; Exodus 33:20; see the Notes section on verse 15.)
Earlier, Paul had warned about the grave spiritual danger posed by a desire for riches and a love of money. Among the believers in Ephesus, some were wealthy and so he directed Timothy to aid them to keep the right perspective regarding themselves and their possessions. Timothy was to command the “rich in the present age” not to be arrogant nor to set their hope on, or to place their trust in, “uncertain riches.” Believers should not assume a proud bearing on account of their means and regard themselves as superior to others because of their wealth and what they can accomplish with it. Present riches are uncertain, for they are temporary and cannot provide real security. Circumstances are subject to change, and war or persecution could lead to the loss of all material possessions. Like other believers, the wealthy should rest their hope on God, fully trusting him to supply their needs. He is the one who provides richly or abundantly everything that humans can enjoy. All good things are really his gifts. (6:17; Acts 14:16, 17; 17:28)
Wealthy believers were to use their assets well in doing what is good, being “rich in good works, generous, ready to share.” Through generous and willing giving to those in need, the wealthy would become “rich in good works.” (6:18)
In this way, the rich would be “treasuring,” storing, or building for themselves a “good foundation for the future.” Their record of generous and rightly motivated giving would prove to be like a treasure deposited in heaven. It would be comparable to their having built a secure and lasting foundation, one that God would look upon favorably and reward richly. Through the proper use of their assets, they would be taking hold of the “real life” or, according to other manuscripts, the “eternal life,” signifying a never-ending relationship with the Father and his Son. (6:19)
Timothy had been entrusted with the sound words of the truth that centered on Christ and what his death accomplished. Additionally, he had been commissioned to serve the community of believers. Paul’s admonition for him to guard what had been entrusted to him would include the deposit of sound teaching and his assignment of service. His being vigilant regarding what he had received would necessitate his “turning away from profane, empty expressions and the contradictions of the falsely called knowledge.” Those who promoted falsehood represented their views as valuable knowledge. Their opinions, however, proved to be no knowledge but defiling and empty, worthless, or ruinous teaching. The contradictions of this “falsely called knowledge” may refer to the strife and disputes to which erroneous views gave rise. (6:20)
By being taken in by this “falsely called knowledge,” some believers had deviated from the faith. They had allowed the baneful influence of erroneous teaching to turn them away from the truth that Jesus Christ had revealed through his words and deeds. (6:21)
Paul concluded with the prayerful thought, “Favor [be] with you.” The pronoun “you” is plural in many manuscripts, suggesting that the apostle’s desire was that the community of believers (and not just Timothy) be recipients of God’s gracious favor in the form of aid, guidance, and blessing. In other manuscripts, the “you” is singular. (6:21; see the Notes section.)
Notes:
In verse 5, many manuscripts end with the additional words, “From such [persons] turn away.”
After “snare” (in verse 9), a number of manuscripts add, “of the devil.”
The Greek text of verse 15 does not specify who would be doing the “showing.” Numerous modern translations are explicit in identifying God as the one. “Our Lord Jesus Christ, who at the due time will be revealed by God.” (NJB) “At the time God has already decided, he will send Jesus Christ back again.” (CEV) “God will make that happen at the right time.” (NCV) “The appearance of our Lord Jesus Christ which God will bring about in his own good time.” (REB)
In numerous manuscripts, the concluding prayerful expression ends with “amen” (so be it).
When referring to himself as an “apostle of Christ Jesus through God’s will,” Paul acknowledged that his apostleship and the authority associated therewith came from God as an expression of his gracious favor. The words that follow (“according to the promise of the life that [is] in Christ Jesus”) could indicate that Paul’s call to be an apostle proved to be in harmony with God’s promise for humans to be reconciled to him and come to possess the newness of life that is made possible by coming to be at one with his Son. Another meaning may be that Paul, as an apostle through God’s will, had the commission to make known God’s promise about the life that is in Christ Jesus or the life that is to be enjoyed by being at one with him as a member of his body. (1:1)
Modern translations contain various interpretive renderings of verse 1. “God sent me to tell about the promise of life that is in Christ Jesus.” (NCV) “He gave me the promised life that Jesus Christ makes possible.” (CEV) “From Paul, apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God, whose promise of life is fulfilled in Christ Jesus.” (REB)
The apostle affectionately addressed Timothy as his “beloved child,” for he was like a father to him, having taught him by word and example. Paul then continued with the prayerful expression, “Favor, mercy, [and] peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord.” The gracious favor or unearned kindness would include the help and guidance the Father and his Son would provide. For Timothy to be a recipient of “mercy” would mean that he would continue to experience their compassionate care, Christ’s intercession, and his Father’s forgiveness. “Peace” would be the sense of well-being, tranquility, and security resulting from Timothy’s continuing to experience the love of God and Christ. (1:2)
Translators have chosen various ways to make the Greek text more explicit regarding Paul’s expression of thanks to God. “I thank God as I always mention you in my prayers, day and night.” (NCV) “Night and day I thank God whom I serve with a pure conscience as my ancestors did.” (NJB) “Night and day I mention you in my prayers. I am always grateful for you, as I pray to the God my ancestors and I have served with a clear conscience.” (CEV) “I give thanks to the God of my forefathers, whom I worship with a clear conscience, when I mention you in my prayers as I do constantly night and day.” (REB) The context does not specifically indicate whether the rendering of thanks specifically relates to Timothy, more specifically to the good remembrance Paul had of him or the recollection he had of Timothy’s commendable faith. Possibly the giving of thanks is more general in nature, including everything for which the apostle was grateful. (1:3)
Paul’s forefathers were worshipers of YHWH, the only true God. So the apostle could speak of himself as serving God as did his ancestors, doing so with a pure conscience. The apostle earnestly endeavored to conduct himself in an upright manner, preserving a clear conscience before God and fellow humans. “Night and day,” or always and at any time of the night or day, Paul, whenever praying, never failed to remember Timothy in his supplications. (1:3; compare Acts 23:1; 24:14-16.)
The apostle recalled the tears Timothy had shed. This must have occurred at a time they parted and when the possibility existed that Timothy might not see Paul again. Finding himself in prison and expecting to be condemned to death (1:8; 4:6), the apostle yearned to see his beloved fellow worker, knowing that this reunion would bring him joy. (1:4)
Paul remembered Timothy’s “unhypocritical faith,” a genuine faith that was not just a mere expression of belief but manifested itself in positive action that honored God and Jesus Christ. The faith that was “in” Timothy had first resided in, or been the inmost possession of, his grandmother Lois and his mother Eunice. Paul expressed the confidence that the same genuine faith was also “in” Timothy, existing as part of his inmost self. (1:5)
“For [this] reason” (in view of Timothy’s having a sincere faith), Paul reminded him to stir into flame the gracious gift of God. Timothy had come to possess this gift when Paul laid his hands on him, designating him for special service. Based on Acts 16:1-3 and the apostle’s earlier comments in 1 Timothy 4:14, Paul chose Timothy as his fellow worker and, with elders from the community of believers joining him, laid his hands on Timothy, thereby appointing him to special service in Christ’s cause. The gracious gift of God that Timothy then received equipped him to fulfill the commission for which he had been designated. This gift was one he should then use to the fullest extent possible, stirring it up into a blaze as one would a smoldering fire. (1:6)
Timothy was not to allow anything to hinder him from making full use of his gift. “For,” as Paul continued, “God did not give us a spirit of cowardice, but of power and of love and of sensibleness.” The God-given spirit may refer to the holy spirit or to the spirit or disposition believers come to have on account of their having received the holy spirit. Through God’s spirit, believers are made bold or courageous, not holding back from declaring and living the faith that has Christ as its focus. Cowardice, fear, or dread is the very opposite of what God’s spirit produces. Unlike the weakness and timidity that is associated with cowardice, the God-given spirit is one of power, making it possible for believers to withstand the strains and pressures to which they are subjected on account of their faith. Love drives fear away. Motivated by love, the individual is not restrained from taking action, fearing possible personal difficulties or even harm because of selflessly coming to the aid of those in need or on account of advancing Christ’s cause. Cowardice clouds good judgment, resulting in inaction or inappropriate behavior. The God-given spirit produces soundness of mind and action that is right under the circumstances, reflecting good judgment, reasonableness, or self-control. (1:7)
In keeping with the disposition that God’s spirit produces, Paul urged Timothy, “Do not be ashamed of the testimony about our Lord nor of me, his prisoner.” On account of bearing testimony regarding the Lord Jesus Christ, Timothy would face ridicule, misrepresentation, mistreatment, and suffering. The demeaning and hateful treatment to which he would be subjected was not to cause him shame, for it was an honor to suffer in the service of Jesus Christ, the King of kings and Lord of lords. Paul’s confinement had resulted from his faithfully serving in the interests of God’s Son. For this reason, the apostle spoke of himself as the Lord’s prisoner. Paul considered it an honor to endure distress for Christ, and so did not want Timothy to be ashamed of him in his situation. Instead, he desired that Timothy share with him in suffering for the good news about Christ. Timothy’s suffering “according to the power of God” would signify his enduring the distressing circumstances with God’s help or with the power he supplies by means of his spirit. (1:8)
Paul and Timothy had good reason for enduring, considering everything that God, through Christ, had done for them and all other fellow believers. He had saved them, forgiving them of their sins and delivering them from the condemnation to which sin leads. His call was an invitation for them to become his reconciled children. In its being a “holy calling,” it had as its purpose their living “holy,” pure, or upright lives. The call had not been extended on the basis of “works” or any personal merit on the part of the called ones. It was an expression of God’s own purpose (originating from himself) and favor or unearned kindness. He granted his gracious favor “in Christ Jesus before eternal times.” From the very beginning and before the ages began, God purposed that humans would be at one with his Son. Whatever the Father expresses to be his will is as good as accomplished. Thus when he, in the indefinite past, purposed to grant his gracious favor to humans, all those who would come to be believers in the future could be spoken of as having been recipients thereof before “eternal times.” (1:9)
With the coming of the Savior Christ Jesus to the earth, God’s gracious favor was fully revealed. Jesus’ life and activity, including his sacrificial death, made it clear how humans could be forgiven of their sins, delivered from the condemnation to which sin leads, and be reconciled to God as his beloved children. By his own death, Christ Jesus broke the power of death. All who respond in faith, accepting his having surrendered his life for them, come to enjoy a newness of life as persons forgiven of their sins and no longer under condemnation. They come into possession of eternal life, the life of an enduring relationship with God and his Son and which life will ultimately be enjoyed in the sinless state for all eternity. (1:10)
“Through the evangel,” the “good news” or the message that he proclaimed and which his life revealed, Jesus Christ brought life and incorruption to light. For the first time, humans could learn how they could come to have the real life, the eternal life, and cease to be subject to death and corruption. With specific reference to this evangel or good news, Paul was appointed to serve as a proclaimer, apostle, and teacher. He proclaimed the message about Jesus Christ and what he accomplished through his death. Paul faithfully discharged his commission as an apostle, one specifically sent forth to advance Christ’s interests. He also functioned as a teacher, imparting instruction about Jesus Christ and his example and teaching in a manner that listeners could understand and apply. (1:10, 11; see the Notes section.)
It was because Paul had advanced the good news about Jesus Christ as a proclaimer, apostle, and teacher that he then suffered as a prisoner. His distressing circumstances, however, did not make him ashamed, thinking that he might have been wrong in the course he had pursued. (1:12)
Paul knew the one whom he had believed. He had put his faith or full trust in God’s Son, confident that his having done so would never lead to disappointment. The apostle did not doubt that Jesus Christ would be able to guard what he had entrusted to him “until that day.” If the reference is to what Paul had entrusted to Christ, it would be the “treasure” he had laid up in heaven through his loyal service to him. On “that day,” which would denote the time when Jesus Christ would return in glory, Paul’s record of faithful service would prove to be like a secure trust under Christ’s guardianship and would be rewarded. (Compare Matthew 6:19-21.) Another possibility is that Jesus Christ would guard what had been entrusted to Paul, assuring that he would fulfill his commission and be found approved on “that day.” (1:12; see the Notes section.)
From Paul, Timothy heard “healthful words,” or sound teaching about God and Christ. The apostle urged him to hold to the “pattern” or “standard” of these words, making sure that he conducted himself accordingly and imparted sound teaching to others. Timothy’s faithful adherence to the pattern, standard, or norm of the “healthful words” was to be “in the faith and love that [are] in Christ Jesus.” This could mean that Timothy’s attachment to sound teaching was to be with the kind of faith or trust and love that the Son of God exemplified while on earth. Another meaning could be that Timothy, in his adherence to the healthful words, was to live a life of faith and love as a believer possessing these qualities because of being “in” or at one with Christ Jesus. (1:13)
Paul admonished Timothy to guard the “good trust,” the precious treasure of healthful words or sound teaching, with the aid of the holy spirit that dwells in believers. The spirit’s influence is holy or pure. Therefore, by letting the spirit be the controlling power in his life, Timothy would have continued being exemplary in his conduct and teaching. (1:14)
“All” the ones from the Roman province of Asia (an area that is now in the western part of Turkey) who deserted Paul would not have been all the believers in cities of that Roman province but persons who were then in Rome and could have been of help to him. Prominent among those who had forsaken him were Phygelus and Hermogenes. Likely, because of fearing adverse consequences, they failed to render aid to Paul while he was imprisoned or when he made his defense. At the time the apostle wrote, Timothy already knew about what certain ones from the province of Asia had done. (1:15)
Unlike Hermogenes, Phygelus, and others who forsook Paul, Onesiphorus searched diligently for him when he came to Rome and succeeded in finding him. Onesiphorus was not ashamed to identify himself with the chained prisoner Paul, fearing that he might be endangering his freedom or safety. He often refreshed the apostle, probably not just by his personal presence but also by attending to his needs. (1:16, 17)
At the time Paul wrote, Onesiphorus may no longer have been alive, for later greetings are conveyed only to the household of Onesiphorus. (4:19) Additionally, the apostle made his prayerful expression for the household because of what Onesiphorus had done for him, often refreshing him and not being ashamed of his situation as a chained prisoner. “May the Lord grant mercy to the household of Onesiphorus.” The mercy of the Lord Jesus Christ would include his continued compassionate care and concern for the members of the household. (1:16)
Paul deeply appreciated what Onesiphorus had done for him, looking for him in Rome until he found him. The apostle’s prayerful expression for Onesiphorus was that the Lord Jesus Christ would grant him “mercy on that day.” “That day” would be the time when Jesus would return in glory and would show his mercy or his great kindness to believers by having them join him as his approved ones in the heavenly realm. It was not just while in Rome that Onesiphorus had proved himself to be a loving brother. As Paul mentioned, Timothy knew about how much service Onesiphorus had rendered in Ephesus. (1:18)
Notes:
After “teacher” (in verse 11), many manuscripts add “of nations.” Instead of “teacher,” a few manuscripts read “servant.”
The reference to what had been entrusted to Timothy (verse 14) provides a basis for concluding that verse 12 may be understood to mean that Jesus Christ would guard what had been entrusted to Paul. The Greek text could be understood to have this meaning or to apply to what Paul had entrusted to Christ, and this is reflected in the renderings of modern translations. “I know whom I have trusted, and am confident of his power to keep safe what he has put into my charge until the great day.” (REB) “I know the one I have faith in, and I am sure that he can guard until the last day what he has trusted me with.” (CEV) “I am sure that he is able to guard until that day what I have entrusted to him.” (NRSV)
Many, out of fear, had abandoned Paul in his time of distress. Apparently for this reason, he admonished Timothy to continue drawing strength from “the favor that [is] in Christ Jesus.” Again, affectionately, the apostle called his beloved fellow worker “my child,” for he had been like a father to him, teaching him by word and example. In the sphere of gracious favor or kindness, which includes all the help and guidance available through Christ, Timothy would be able to acquire strength. This favor is referred to as being “in Christ Jesus” probably because it is granted to all who are at one with him. (2:1)
Timothy had repeatedly heard Paul’s teaching. According to a literal reading of the Greek text, he heard the things the apostle taught “through many witnesses.” This could mean that Timothy heard these things in the presence of many witnesses, from numerous other believers besides Paul, or as the teaching to which genuine believers adhered and which they made known. Whereas the evangel or good news about Christ had been directly revealed to Paul, the message he proclaimed did not differ from that of the many witnesses whom the Son of God had taught while on earth. (Galatians 1:15-23; 2:6-9) So, in an indirect way, the things Timothy heard from Paul would have been what he also heard from many other believers. The apostle asked that Timothy pass on what he had learned to faithful or trustworthy men who would be able to teach others. (2:2)
In carrying out his commission, Timothy, while faced with difficult circumstances, would also be engaging in a battle against false teachings and corrupt practices. As a “good soldier of Christ Jesus,” he would suffer hardships. (2:3)
A Roman soldier could not be involved in the pursuits of ordinary life, but had to give his undivided attention to his duties to be pleasing to his superior. An athlete would not receive the victory wreath if he failed to follow the rules. The farmer who labored would be the one to partake of the fruits, being the first to enjoy a share of the harvested crops. (2:4-6)
Paul wanted Timothy to give attention to what he had said about the soldier, the athlete, and the farmer, drawing the appropriate lesson therefrom. The apostle added, “The Lord will grant you comprehension in everything.” As he wanted the more important spiritual aspect to be understood, Paul was confident that the Lord Jesus Christ would enable Timothy to derive the full benefit from what he had written. Just as there were requirements soldiers, athletes, and farmers had to fulfill to attain the desired results, Timothy would need to discharge his responsibilities faithfully to be pleasing to God and the Lord Jesus Christ, sharing in all the privileges and blessings that would be bestowed on all who are found to be approved. (2:7)
Prominent features of the good news that Paul wanted Timothy to recall were the resurrection of Jesus Christ and his being from the line of King David (literally, “from the seed of David”). When using the expression “my evangel,” Paul meant the message about Jesus Christ that he proclaimed. In his preaching the evangel or good news, he always emphasized that Jesus had been raised from the dead. The resurrection undeniably proved that Jesus is indeed the Son of God and that only through him can humans be forgiven of their sins and be liberated from the condemnation to which sin leads. The fact that Jesus came to be in the line of David established that he is the foretold Christ or Messiah. (2:8; Acts 13:16-39)
Paul was then suffering imprisonment as if he had been a criminal. His confinement had resulted from his activity as a proclaimer of the message about Jesus Christ. Although he himself was bound and deprived of freedom of movement, the “word of God” (the message that focused on Christ as the one through whom reconciliation with God is possible) was not bound. Other believers continued to spread the good news extensively in the Greco-Roman world. (2:9; compare Philippians 1:12-14.)
The apostle did not doubt that having the approval of God and Christ would result in lasting blessings. So he was willing to endure everything for the sake of the elect (believers whom God had chosen to be his people). His activity among the non-Jewish peoples had led to his imprisonment, and so it was for those who became believers that he endured distress and hardship. Moreover, the apostle’s willingness to endure suffering would encourage fellow believers to do likewise when subjected to trials and difficulties for the Lord Jesus Christ. Paul earnestly desired that, on account of what he was prepared to endure in the advancement of Christ’s cause, these chosen ones would obtain the “salvation [that is] in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.” (2:10)
Salvation, or forgiveness of sins and liberation from the condemnation to which sin leads, is only available “in” Christ. The reference to salvation being “in” Christ may signify that he is the one through whom deliverance from sin and condemnation is effected. Another possible meaning is that all who rest their faith on him are saved or delivered from sin and condemnation. In the ultimate sense, the fullness of salvation will be experienced in the sinless state. Apparently for this reason, being saved is linked to “eternal glory.” Believers will share in the glory, magnificence, or splendor of the Lord Jesus Christ. (2:10)
The “word” or message conveyed in the composition that Paul next quoted is “faithful,” dependable, or trustworthy. This “word” appears to have been part of an early Christian composition. “For if we died [with him], we will also live [with him]. If we endure, we will also reign [with him]. If we deny [him], he will deny us. If we are unfaithful, he remains faithful, for he cannot deny himself.” (2:11-13)
Upon putting faith in Christ Jesus and, at the time of their baptism, acknowledging him as the one through whom forgiveness of sins and reconciliation with his Father have been made possible, believers become members of Christ’s body. As members of his body, they share in his experiences as their head. Christ died, and members of his body then died with him. Just as Christ rose from the dead, believers, at the time of their baptism die with reference to their old self and are raised to a newness of life as God’s approved children. Ultimately, this will mean enjoying a never-ending relationship with Christ (and his Father) in the sinless state. (2:11)
Believers who faithfully endure trials and hardships for the sake of Christ will also reign with him, receiving their share in the realm where he rules as king. Those who deny him, disowning him as the Lord who died for them and whose example and teaching they are to follow, will not be acknowledged as belonging to him. The Lord Jesus Christ will disown them, refusing to acknowledge having any relationship with them. (2:12)
If believers prove unfaithful, ceasing to live a life that harmonizes with his example and teaching, Jesus Christ does not change. He remains faithful, always trustworthy and dependable as the head of his corporate body, the community of believers. It is impossible for Christ to deny himself. Never will he prove false. He is the same yesterday, today, and forever. (2:13; Hebrews 13:8)
In keeping with what he had just said, Paul asked that Timothy remind fellow believers of their being willing to suffer hardships for the sake of Christ and to remain faithful to him as their Lord. Additionally, Timothy was to charge them solemnly before God (the Lord, according to many manuscripts) not to fight over words. (2:14)
Wrangling about the significance of certain words would not benefit anyone and would have a ruinous or upsetting effect on listeners. Fights over certain terms distract from, obscure, or distort the message that the words as a whole are intended to convey. Those who engage in disputes tend to be more interested in gaining the best of an argument than they are in advancing the cause of truth. Controversies over words raise doubts in the minds of listeners, causing them to question whether the things they have learned are really true and whether anyone can be trusted. What they may have once valued and appreciated comes to be marred by unsettling feelings of uncertainty. (2:14; see the Notes section.)
Paul urged Timothy to be earnest in seeking to present himself as one who is approved before God, as a worker who has nothing of which to be ashamed, using the “word of truth” aright. The Greek word that may be understood to mean “to use aright” is orthotoméo, literally signifying the act of cutting a way or path in a straight manner. In relation to the “word of truth” (the message about Christ and what his Father has accomplished through him), the expression orthotoméo may denote teaching the message aright or expounding it soundly. By being exemplary in avoiding fights over words and doing his best to teach and proclaim the truth that Jesus Christ revealed, Timothy would have had no cause for shame because of having misrepresented God or Christ. Through diligent adherence to sound teaching, he would prove himself to be an approved worker to God. (2:15)
Timothy needed to avoid “profane, empty expressions,” mere idle talk that did nothing to encourage others to live an upright life. Those who engage in profane babbling end up progressively becoming more ungodly, and their ruinous talk spreads “like gangrene,” with its pernicious influence wreaking havoc to the faith of all who are deceived thereby. (2:16, 17)
Paul singled out Hymenaeus and Philetus as being among those who engaged in profane chatter. These two men had strayed from the truth, claiming that the resurrection had already occurred. Although Paul did not include the specifics of their views, Timothy would have known just what falsehoods they were spreading. Their teaching had upset or undermined the faith of some believers, apparently causing them to doubt that there would actually be a future resurrection. (2:17, 18)
Despite the destructive effect of false teaching, Paul was confident that the “solid foundation of God” continues to stand. Timothy likely understood Christ to be the foundation or the cornerstone of the foundation that included the apostles. (1 Corinthians 3:11; Ephesians 2:19, 20) The designation “foundation of God,” when applied to Christ, would fit his being identified as the “living stone” that God laid and on which the community of believers is built. (1 Peter 2:4-6) This foundation bears an inscription (literally, “has this seal”), “The Lord knows those who are his,” and “Let everyone calling on [literally, ‛naming’] the name of the Lord abstain from unrighteousness.” The Lord Jesus Christ acknowledges as his own all who are truly built on him as the foundation, and they are identified by their upright conduct, shunning all unrighteousness, or attitudes, words, and deeds that are contrary to his example and teaching. Their “naming” or calling on the name of the Lord signifies their acknowledging him as their Lord and living in harmony therewith. (2:19; see the Notes section.)
Whereas the foundation is sure and the community of believers constitutes a sanctuary on this foundation, this does not mean that all who identify themselves as part of that community truly belong to it. As the inscription reveals, the Lord is the one who knows his own. Therefore, not all professing believers are necessarily good associates. Paul called to Timothy’s attention that various kinds of vessels or utensils could be found in a large house. There would be precious vessels made from gold or silver, and others fashioned from wood or clay. The precious vessels would be regarded as honorable, often being reserved for use on special occasions. Vessels or utensils that lacked honor would be the ones made from inferior materials and would be used for common or for menial utilitarian purposes. (2:20)
With seeming reference to the community of believers, which includes both honorable and dishonorable vessels, Paul emphasized the need for cleansing oneself from the dishonorable ones, probably meaning not to allow oneself to be contaminated by them. This would be by distancing oneself from them and not making them one’s intimate companions. All who remain free from the defilement of wrong conduct and teaching would prove themselves to be honorable or noble vessels, “sanctified” (set apart as holy or pure) and “useful” to their “owner.” The owner could be the Lord Jesus Christ who bought them with his precious blood. As his approved disciples, Jesus Christ would be able to use them to further his interests, and they would be prepared or fitted for “every good work,” which could include any noble service that he assigned or that honored him. It is also possible that the “owner” is God (as a number of translations make explicit), for he purchased humans with the blood of his own Son. (2:21; compare Acts 20:28.)
The Greek text of verse 21 is not specific in saying that one should keep clean from dishonorable vessels. It literally reads, “If, then, one should have cleansed himself from these.” This has been rendered as applying either to things or to people. “All who cleanse themselves of the things I have mentioned will become special utensils, dedicated and useful to the owner of the house, ready for every good work.” (NRSV) “All who make themselves clean from evil will be used for special purposes. They will be made holy, useful to the Master, ready to do any good work.” (NCV) “If a man cleanses himself from the latter [the ones for ignoble purposes], he will be an instrument for noble purposes, made holy, useful to the Master and prepared to do any good work.” (NIV) Wenn sich jemand von Menschen fern hält, die einem Gefäß mit unreinem Inhalt gleichen, wird er ein Gefäß sein, das ehrenvollen Zwecken dient. Er steht Gott zur Verfügung und ist ihm, dem Hausherrn, nützlich, bereit, all das Gute zu tun, das dieser ihm aufträgt. (If someone keeps himself distant from people who are like a vessel with unclean contents, he will be a vessel that serves honorable purposes. He is available to God and is useful to him, the Master of the house, ready to perform all the good that this [Master] assigns to him.) (Neue Genfer Übersetzung, German).
At the time Paul wrote to him, Timothy was still comparatively young (probably in his late thirties). Therefore, the apostle admonished him to flee from the desires or passions that are particularly prominent among younger men. The exhortation to flee would signify that Timothy should quickly avoid any situation that might tempt him to yield to a wrong desire. His earnest objective was to be the pursuit of righteousness or uprightness, faith (continued growth in his faith in God and Christ and probably also personal trustworthiness), love (compassionate concern for those in need and a willingness to forgo personal interests for the benefit of others), peace (an inner sense of tranquility and the furtherance of good relationships with others). These noble qualities were to be pursued in association with exemplary fellow believers who called “upon the Lord out of a clean heart.” These fellow believers would be persons who, in attitude, word, and deed, acknowledged Jesus Christ as their Lord and were motivated to serve him out of the purity of their hearts or their inmost selves. (2:22)
Timothy needed to shun foolish and ignorant “seekings,” “searchings,” or questionings, not allowing himself to be drawn into idle inquiries that produced nothing beneficial or useful but only gave rise to fights, controversies, or disputes. (2:23)
As a slave of the Lord Jesus Christ, Timothy did not need to fight, engaging in heated or angry arguments or debates. Instead, a servant of God’s Son “needs to be gentle” or kindly “toward all,” not responding with anger or harshness when encountering resistance to sound teaching. Being able to teach would denote being able to impart instruction in a manner that others could understand and that would not stir up needless controversy. In the event certain ones proved to be unresponsive or resistant to truth, seeking to wrangle, the one doing the teaching was to exercise restraint, not lashing out in anger or resentment but remaining patient under the unfavorable circumstances. (2:24)
When dealing with those who are resistant or not rightly inclined, a servant of Christ was not to respond in a harsh manner but instruct or correct with mildness or gentleness. The objective would have been to appeal to such ones in a kindly manner, hoping that God may grant them a spirit of repentance, leading them back to the truth from which they had strayed. The response of the one earnestly trying to instruct or correct in a mild way could motivate the wayward ones to think seriously about their course of action and make them amenable to the operation of God’s spirit, motivating them to repent and once again to know the truth as Christ lived and taught it. On the other hand, a harsh and unloving response could easily lead to a hardening in the attitude of straying individuals, making it even more difficult for them to change. (2:25)
The good effect of mildness or gentleness on wayward ones may cause them to come to their senses and escape from the devil’s snare. The devil had caught them alive (zogréo). If the Greek term zogréo here has the basic meaning of “capture alive” and not just “catch” or “capture,” the expression could suggest that the straying ones had been trapped as believers who were not dead in trespasses and sins, making their plight as wayward believers graver than that of unbelievers. (2:26)
The concluding words may be understood to indicate that those who had strayed were caught to do the devil’s will or that their getting free from the devil’s snare would be to do God’s will. (2:26) Both meanings are found in the renderings of modern translations. “And they may wake up and escape from the trap of the devil, who catches them to do what he wants.” (NCV) “Thus they may come to their senses and escape from the devil’s snare in which they have been trapped and held at his will.” (REB) “They have been trapped by the devil, and he makes them obey him, but God may help them escape.” (CEV) “And that they may escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him, to do his (that is, God’s) will.” (NRSV, footnote) “They may come to their senses and be rescued from the power of the devil by the servant of the Lord and set to work for God’s purposes.” (J. B. Phillips)
Notes:
The manuscript evidence for verse 14 does not make it possible to determine whether “Lord” or “God” represents the original reading. A few manuscripts say “Christ.”
In verse 19, the first part of the inscription (“The Lord knows those who are his”) is nearly the same as the extant Septuagint reading of Numbers 16:5, where the reference is to God. Isaiah 26:13, in the Septuagint, contains words that parallel the second part of the inscription (“we name your name”). Paul, however, did not introduce either part as a quotation nor did he use the words as supporting quotations. Therefore, the expressions he chose may be regarded as reflecting his thorough acquaintance with the words contained in the Greek translation of the sacred writings, and his reference to the Lord may be understood to apply to the Lord Jesus Christ.
Paul wanted Timothy to “know” or to be aware of future developments that would seriously affect the community of believers. The apostle mentioned that difficult or stressful times lay ahead, and these hard times would characterize the “last days.” Believers in the first century understood that a new age had dawned with Jesus’ coming to the earth and that they were then living in the “last days” that would culminate in his return in glory. (Acts 2:17-21; Hebrews 1:1, 2; 1 Peter 1:20) Paul, though, used the future tense when mentioning the moral corruption that would come to exist among professing believers, and the moral breakdown is what would make life difficult. This suggests that these “last days” designate the period just before Jesus Christ’s arrival with power and great magnificence. That the apostle’s description relates to professing believers is evident from his later reference (3:5) to their having an outward “form of godliness,” which would not apply to the world of mankind in a general sense. (3:1; see the Notes section.)
Instead of having genuine concern for fellow humans, individuals would be lovers of themselves, selfishly focused on their own interests. They would be lovers of money (literally, lovers of silver), determined to increase their possessions with no regard for any ill effect their inordinate striving for money might have on them or others. People would be boasters, putting on a pretense and making exaggerated claims about themselves and their accomplishments. Through their bragging, they would make others feel like nobodies. They would be haughty, elevating themselves and despising or demeaning persons they considered to have a lower status in society. As “blasphemers,” they would be individuals who used abusive language. Youths would be disobedient to their parents, refusing to listen to sound advice and manifesting disrespect and defiance. A spirit of ingratitude would prevail, with individuals showing no appreciation, and people would have no regard for what is holy or pure. (3:2)
The moral breakdown would be reflected in the absence of the love or tender feelings that should exist among family members. People would be unwilling to resolve conflicts, refusing to reconcile or to come to amiable solutions or agreements. They would be slanderers, defaming fellow humans. Individuals would be unbridled in their conduct. They would be brutal, ruthless, or violent, and would have no love or appreciation for the things that are good or morally excellent but would be hostile to them. (3:3)
People could not be trusted, for they would be betrayers, resorting to treachery either to protect themselves or to gain personal advantage. They would be rash, reckless, or thoughtless, puffed up with conceit or deluded, and “lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God.” Their whole object in living, instead of being concerned about doing God’s will, would be to pursue whatever satisfied their sensual desires. (3:4)
Professing believers would have a form of godliness or piety, suggesting that they would be engaging in the outward forms of worship as a matter of routine or ritual. Yet, their disposition, words, and deeds would reveal that the transforming power of godliness had not taken root. Theirs would be an empty profession, with no evidence of a faith that motivated upright conduct and caring deeds. Thus they would be denying the power of true godliness. (3:5)
At the time Paul wrote to Timothy, certain ones in the community of believers were already manifesting the divinely disapproved traits that characterized persons who merely had a “form of godliness.” Therefore, the apostle urged Timothy, “From these turn away,” avoiding such corrupt individuals and distancing himself from them. (3:5)
In the Greco-Roman world, many women had little exposure to the outside world and their opportunities for learning were significantly fewer than those of men who had the same social standing. The limitations that society imposed on women made them more susceptible than men to be won over by unsound reasoning. That there was a desire to keep women less educated is reflected in Satire VI of Juvenal (Roman poet and satirist of the first/second century CE). He wrote, “Let [a woman] not know all history; let there be some things that she does not understand.” “I hate a woman,” Juvenal continued, “who observes all the rules and laws of language, who like an antiquary quotes verses that I never heard of, and corrects her unlettered female friends for slips of speech that no man need trouble himself about.”
From among those whom Timothy was to avoid were active proponents of error who appear to have regarded women as being more readily persuaded than men. In order to get access to the women in the household, they slyly sought to gain entrance into the homes. Once they were in a home, they would focus their attention on women who were not firmly grounded in the truth about God and Christ and who were insecure about their standing with God. Paul described the women whom the teachers of falsehood made their captives or victims as “simple women [gynaikárion], loaded down with sins, led by various desires, always learning and never able to come to a knowledge of the truth.” (3:6, 7)
The term gynaikárion is a diminutive form of the Greek word for woman and was used in a pejorative manner. Translators have variously rendered the expression as “silly women” (NCV, NJB, NRSV, REB), “weak-willed women” (NIV), “weak women” (NASB), “idle women” (HCSB), “foolish women” (NLB), and “vulnerable women” (NLT). In being designated as “loaded down with sins,” these women appear to have been burdened with a guilty conscience because of the life they had led. At the same time, they were subject to various desires that likely made them prone to accept flattery and special attention from men. Corrupt teachers were able to exploit the weaknesses of these women. (3:6)
Although they seem to have wanted to learn new things and were always ready to listen to those who presumed to be teachers, the women never came to a knowledge of the truth. They never really embraced the truth that Jesus Christ revealed by what he did and taught. They remained devoid of the transforming power of this truth in their lives. (3:7)
The advocates of error were like Jannes and Jambres who resisted Moses. Although not mentioned elsewhere in the Scriptures, these men were widely known as having been practicers of magic in ancient Egypt. Both Origen (Against Celsus, IV, 51) and Eusebius mentioned a certain Numenius as referring to Jannes and Jambres in the time of Moses. Quoting Numenius, Eusebius (Preparation for the Gospel, IX, 8) wrote, “And next in order came Jannes and Jambres, Egyptian sacred scribes, men judged to have no superiors in the practice of magic, at the time when the Jews were being driven out of Egypt.” In his Natural History (XXX, ii), Pliny the Elder includes Jannes as one from whom a branch of magic was derived. Like Jannes and Jambres who opposed Moses, the teachers of error were “corrupted in mind, disapproved respecting the faith.” These proponents of falsehood did not adhere to the truth that Jesus Christ exemplified in his life and teaching. They opposed this truth by their words and deeds. What they taught proved to be a product of twisted reasoning and, in no respect, did they represent genuine faith or trust in God and Christ. Neither in their conduct nor in their teaching did these men uphold the common faith of the community of believers. Unlike the teaching that promoted genuine faith that produced noble conduct and compassionate concern for persons in need, their teaching was base, worthless, defiling, and destructive. (3:8)
Paul confidently looked ahead to the time these teachers of error would be exposed as were Jannes and Jambres when they were forced to acknowledge the power of God and the limits of their magical arts. (Compare Exodus 8:18, 19.) The apostle did not doubt that they would fail to make progress in spreading their error and that (as had happened in the case of Jannes and Jambres) their senselessness would become evident to “all,” probably meaning the whole community of genuine believers. All who followed Jesus’ example and teaching would have been able to identify the dissident teachers as persons who expounded foolish, worthless, and ruinous ideas. (3:9)
Paul had faithfully carried out has commission in advancing the interests of Jesus Christ, and Timothy had “followed” (parakolouthéo) the apostle’s teaching, conduct, purpose, faith, patience, love, endurance, persecutions, and sufferings. (3:10, 11)
The Greek term parakolouthéo can convey the thought of following closely, conforming to someone’s example by paying careful attention to it. While Timothy did imitate Paul as the apostle imitated Christ, he would not have been a sharer in the kind of persecutions the apostle endured in Antioch, Iconium, and Lystra. In the present context, therefore, parakoulothéo may have the sense of carefully observing or taking note of. (3:10) This significance is often found in modern translations. “But you, my son, have observed closely my teaching and manner of life.” (REB) “But you, Timothy, have known intimately both what I have taught and how I have lived.” (J. B. Phillips) “Timothy, you know what I teach and how I live.” (CEV)
As the apostle’s fellow worker, Timothy would have been able to hear his teaching and faithfully to impart it to others. He would have been fully aware of the way Paul lived his life, his purpose in being totally devoted to the Son of God and his Father and to be faithful in discharging his divinely granted commission, and his faith or his unqualified trust in God and Christ. In the apostle’s interactions with others and the manner in which he dealt with unfavorable or distressing circumstances, Timothy would have been able to note his patience or forbearance. Paul set an example in love, foregoing personal rights for the sake of others and being self-sacrificing, doing everything within his power to aid fellow believers and never to be a burden to them. Timothy would have known the hardships and difficulties Paul endured as he traveled extensively to make known the good news about Christ. (3:10; compare Acts 20:18-24; 2 Corinthians 11:23-29.)
The apostle often found himself experiencing persecution and suffering because of his activity in advancing Christ’s interests. Repeatedly his life was threatened, and he endured abuse, mistreatment, and imprisonment. In Pisidian Antioch, Jewish opposers succeeded in inciting prominent women and men against Paul and Barnabas, and both of them were driven out of the city. (Acts 13:50) Thereafter, for a considerable time in Iconium, Paul and Barnabas helped many Jews and non-Jews to become believers. The unbelieving Jews then became hostile and stirred up the non-Jewish population against them. Upon learning of an attempt to stone them, Paul and Barnabas were forced to flee to Lystra and then to Derbe. (Acts 14:1-6) As Lystra appears to have been Timothy’s home, he may have learned about what happened to Paul and Barnabas from believers who had firsthand knowledge, or he may even have been an actual witness. After Paul healed a man who had been lame from birth, the people concluded that he and Barnabas were gods. The priest of Zeus and the awe-struck crowd wanted to offer a sacrifice to them, and Paul and Barnabas were scarcely able to restrain them from doing so. Later, Jewish opposers from Antioch and Iconium arrived in the city and stirred up the populace against Paul. They then stoned him and dragged him outside the city, thinking that he was dead. When a group of believers thereafter surrounded him, he got up, entered the city, and then left the next day with Barnabas. (Acts 14:1-20) Paul credited the Lord Jesus Christ with having rescued him from all the persecutions to which he had been subjected. (3:11)
Based on the experience of believers generally, particularly his own, and the teaching of Jesus Christ (John 15:20), Paul could tell Timothy that all who wanted to live a godly life “in Christ Jesus,” or as persons at one with him as members of his body, would be persecuted. (3:12) Wicked men and impostors, however, would progressively go from bad to worse, “deceiving and being deceived.” Such morally corrupt individuals made a pretense of being believers. They were self-deceived, imagining their views to be right. Both in conduct and teaching, they would depart farther and farther from the example and teaching of God’s Son. With the false reasoning by means of which they had deluded themselves, they would be able to mislead others. (3:13)
In view of the corrupt influence of proponents of error, Paul urged Timothy to hold fast to what he had learned and come to firmly believe, “knowing from whom he had learned” everything. Those who taught Timothy were not deceivers but trustworthy persons who loved him and were concerned about his well-being. His initial exposure to sound teaching about God came from his grandmother Lois and his mother Eunice. (1:5) Later, he continued to learn from others in the community of believers and, especially, from Paul. (3:14)
From infancy, or from his earliest recollection as a youngster, Timothy had known the “sacred writings.” He must have come to this early knowledge through the efforts of his godly grandmother and mother. The sacred writings were read in the Jewish synagogues (commonly from the Greek translation in areas other than the land of Israel), and that is where Lois and Eunice regularly could have heard what they would have been able to impart to young Timothy. These sacred writings could make him wise “for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.” The sacred writings pointed forward to the coming of the Messiah, how forgiveness of sins would be made possible through him, and how reconciliation with God would thus be effected. (Compare Isaiah 53:1-11; Jeremiah 31:31-34; Ezekiel 36:25-27.) Accordingly, all the essentials for salvation or deliverance from sin had been revealed in the holy writings, requiring only that individuals come to know Jesus as the promised Messiah or Christ and to put faith in him. (3:15; compare Acts 8:27-38; see the Notes section.)
Paul referred to the sacred writings as “all scripture divinely inspired [theópneustos] and useful for teaching, for reproving, for correcting, for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent, fitted for every good work.” The distinguishing feature about the holy writings was the source of their inspiration — God. With confidence, therefore, Timothy would be able to use the sacred writings to teach others about God and Christ, to reprove any who strayed in their teaching or conduct from faithful adherence to the sacred writings, and to correct developments in the community of believers that reflected a diminishing in love for God, Christ, and fellow humans, especially fellow believers. To bring honor to God and Christ, believers needed to live upright lives, and Timothy would have been able to use the holy writings to assist fellow believers to grow in progressively coming to be more like the Son of God in disposition, word, and deed. Thus they would be trained or disciplined in righteousness or right doing and acting. (3:16; see the Notes section.)
In his beneficial use of the holy writings, Timothy would also have needed to apply the admonition to himself. This required that he personally be attentive to the teaching, reproof, correction, and discipline in righteousness that the sacred writings contained. In the case of Timothy, as a “man of God” or a man belonging to God as his servant, the sacred writings qualified him to meet all the demands of the commission that had been entrusted to him. They made him fit for “every good work,” enabling him to render needed aid, comfort, admonition, and encouragement to others. (3:17)
Notes:
The context in which the expression “last days” (3:1) is found indicates that, by mentioning the future developments, Paul wanted to stress the need for Timothy to adhere faithfully in his conduct and teaching to the truth about God and Christ that he had learned and on which his faith rested. There is no contextual basis for using Paul’s words to fit into a specific “end times” theology.
The apostle knew both Hebrew and Greek and so would have been aware of the fact that the Greek translation did not always correspond to the Hebrew text with which he was familiar. Still, although Timothy’s exposure to the sacred writings must have been through the Greek translation, the apostle could refer to him (in verse 15) as having known the holy writings from infancy. This suggests that the message, not the specific words, is the main feature of divine inspiration.
The first-century Jewish historian Josephus confirms that children were taught the sacred writings at an early age. He wrote (Against Apion, I, 8), “It becomes natural to all Jews, immediately and from their very birth, to esteem those books to contain divine doctrines, and to persist in them, and, if occasion be, willingly to die for them.”
For the most part, there is no uncertainty about which writings the Jews considered to be sacred in the first century. The way in which Josephus grouped them, however, does leave some room for question. “For we have not an innumerable multitude of books among us,” Josephus notes, “but only twenty-two books, which contain the records of all the past times; which are justly believed to be divine; and of them five belong to Moses [Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy], which contain his laws and the traditions of the origin of mankind till his death.” Regarding the other books, he continues, “As to the time from the death of Moses till the reign of Artaxerxes, king of Persia, who reigned after Xerxes, the prophets, who were after Moses, wrote down what was done in their times in thirteen books. The remaining four books contain hymns to God, and precepts for the conduct of human life.” (Against Apion, I, 8) The twelve “Minor Prophets,” as confirmed by the Dead Sea Scrolls, were included in one scroll and so would have been regarded as one book. Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel were definitely among the thirteen. Josephus elsewhere refers to Daniel as a prophet. What cannot be known for a certainty is just how he counted the historical books among the thirteen prophets. The book of Psalms is the one that contains hymns, and Proverbs and Ecclesiastes could be described as containing “precepts for the conduct of human life.” The fourth book in this category, though, is not as readily identifiable.
Among the Dead Sea Scrolls, portions of nearly all the books in the present Hebrew Bible have been found. No parts of the books of Nehemiah and Esther have been discovered, and there is a question as to whether one small fragment is actually from a Chronicles manuscript. On the other hand, 20 manuscripts of 1 Enoch have been found, raising the question as to whether there were Jews who regarded this book as one of the holy writings. Other books among the Dead Sea Scrolls are Sirach, the Epistle of Jeremiah, and Tobit (all three of which are included in the Roman Catholic, Greek, and Slavonic Bibles).
The Greek word for “divinely inspired” (theópneustos) is only found in 2 Timothy 3:16 and does not appear in the Septuagint. It is a compound of theós (god) and pnéo (blow, breathe). Whereas the context does not specifically define the sense in which the holy writings could be described as “God-breathed,” “divinely inspired,” or “inspired by God,” many have been very specific in enunciating what is meant. Possibly the words of Josephus reflect the common first-century Jewish view that only the prophets “have written the original and earliest accounts of things as they learned them of God himself by inspiration; and others have written what has happened in their own times.” (Against Apion, I, 7) This does suggest that not everything in the “sacred writings” was regarded as direct revelation, but that these writings contained trustworthy accounts, including what the prophets learned by divine inspiration.
Paul solemnly charged Timothy before God and Christ Jesus. Stressing the seriousness of Timothy’s faithfully discharging his commission, the apostle included mention of Jesus’ role as the one “about to judge the living and the dead, and his appearing and his kingdom.” Timothy was accountable to both God and Jesus Christ, but the Father had committed all judging to his Son. This judgment would be universal, including the living and the dead, and would commence at Christ’s appearing or his returning with royal authority as King of kings and Lord or lords. Appropriately, therefore, Paul mentioned both Christ’s appearing or return and his kingdom. (4:1; see the Notes section.)
The apostle continued with the responsibilities he solemnly charged Timothy to fulfill, “Proclaim the word; attend [to it in] favorable time [and] unfavorable time; reprove, censure (epitimáo), encourage (parakaléo), in all patience and teaching.” When fulfilling his commission, Timothy would be proclaiming the “word” or message that revealed the truth about God and Christ and how acceptance of this truth should be evident in the disposition, speech, and activity of believers. Developments within the community of believers might at certain times make individuals less favorably disposed to heed the message that Timothy had been charged to proclaim. Nevertheless, whether the time was favorable or unfavorable on account of the attitude of believers, he would still be obligated to preach the message that they needed to hear. (4:2)
Whenever fellow believers strayed from living as Christ’s disciples or began to spread teaching that conflicted with what Christ taught, Timothy would have to reprove and censure them, exposing the error of their ways and insisting on corrective action. The Greek term epitimáo conveys the thought of expressing strong disapproval, censure, or rebuke. (4:2)
There would be times when believers were in need of encouragement or comfort. The Greek term parakaléo literally means to summon or call to one’s side and can signify to appeal to, urge, implore, exhort, encourage, or comfort. (4:2)
Especially when the circumstances were not favorable for proclaiming the “word,” Timothy would have to be patient, calmly bearing up under provocation. The linkage of “patience” to “teaching” may denote patience in teaching or all the patience that is required when teaching or instructing. Accordingly, the manner in which Timothy would have to reprove, censure, and encourage would be with patience or forbearance, but what he would say would have to be instructive, reflecting sound teaching. (4:2)
Paul indicated that, in the future, the situation within the community of believers would deteriorate. The time would come when they would not be amenable to “healthful teaching.” Such healthful or sound teaching would be based on the “holy writings” and Jesus’ example and instruction. A significant number within the community of believers would become intolerant of sound teaching. “According to their own desires,” they would “accumulate teachers for themselves,” teachers who would impart the novel things they wanted to hear (literally, “tickle [itch or scratch] the hearing”). Instead of being satisfied with sound teaching that served to promote growth as Christ’s disciples and wanting to be taught by those who were capable and earnestly desirous of imparting this teaching, they would choose teachers to their liking, men who would satisfy their itch to hear new, tantalizing, exciting, and speculative bits of information. (4:3)
The straying professed believers would turn away from listening to the truth, the message that rightly focused on Christ, and turn aside to “myths,” worthless and utterly false stories of human invention. (4:4)
In view of these future developments, Paul urged Timothy, “You, however, be sober in everything, [be willing to] suffer evil, do the work of an evangelist, fully accomplish your service.” In view of the varying situations and circumstances he would be facing, Timothy needed to “be sober” or in full possession of his senses, manifesting reasonableness and self-restraint and avoiding rashness. Hostility toward believers among unbelievers would continue, and so he would have to be willing to endure the suffering that persecutors and opposers would inflict on him. As an evangelist, Timothy would be making known the good news about Jesus Christ and what he accomplished by sacrificing his life. Timothy’s service would include everything that he had been commissioned to do in advancing the interests of Christ, both within and outside the community of believers. (4:5; see the Notes section.)
Commenting on his own situation as a prisoner, Paul spoke of himself as already being “poured out” like a drink offering and the time of his “releasing” as having arrived. This indicates that he expected his life to end shortly, with the releasing signifying a releasing from his mortal body by having the death sentence imposed on him. (Compare 2 Peter 1:13-15.) He felt that the process that would end in his death had already begun as if he were being poured out like a drink offering. (4:6)
Paul had “fought” the “good fight,” which included all his struggles in advancing the interests of the Lord Jesus Christ and resisting those whose defiling conduct and ruinous teaching undermined the faith of some within the community of believers. The apostle had finished the “race,” having completed his course in life as one who faithfully adhered to Christ’s example and teaching when fulfilling his commission as an apostle. Paul had held to the faith, with its focus on the Son of God and all that his Father accomplished through him. The apostle did not waver respecting his faith or trust in God and Christ. (4:7)
Confidently, therefore, Paul knew that the “crown of righteousness” had been reserved for him. Like a victory wreath with which one who had successfully finished the race is crowned, Paul would be crowned or granted the absolute righteousness for which he longed. The “righteous judge” would give him this righteousness as if crowning him with a victory wreath. Jesus Christ is the judge, for his Father has entrusted him with all judging authority and all of his decisions will be impartial and absolutely just. Besides Paul, all other believers who loved Christ’s appearing would receive the “crown of righteousness.” The appearing on “that day” relates to the time when Jesus Christ would return in the capacity of Judge and King of kings and Lord of lords. Those loving his appearing would be all who looked forward to the time of his return and longed to be united with him, coming to enjoy the enduring relationship with him as persons in possession of absolute righteousness in the sinless state. (4:8)
With his death being close at hand, Paul wanted Timothy to hasten to come to him as quickly as possible. (4:9) Demas, because he “loved the present age,” had forsaken the apostle and gone to Thessalonica. Instead of choosing to be helpful and supportive to Paul, Demas abandoned him probably because of not wanting to risk his freedom or his life. He must have been more concerned about his own safety and welfare than about Paul, demonstrating greater love for the existing age in relation to his life than he did for an apostle and a brother in need. Crescens had left for Galatia (a Roman province in what is Turkey today), and Titus for Dalmatia (a mountainous region east of the Adriatic Sea). Paul did not explain why they had departed. The absence of any negative expression suggests that they departed with his approval or had good reason for doing so. (4:10) At the time, Luke was still with the apostle. (4:11)
Years earlier, Paul was highly displeased that Mark had not remained with him and Barnabas after leaving Cyprus and continuing to declare the good news about Christ in Asia Minor. Later, this caused a rift between Barnabas and Paul, with Barnabas choosing to work with his cousin Mark and Paul deciding to have Silas as his companion. (Acts 12:25; 13:13, 14; 15:37-41) When the apostle wrote to Timothy, his relationship to Mark had changed. He requested that Timothy have Mark join him in coming to see him, adding, “for he is useful to me in service.” This indicates that Paul had come to regard Mark highly as a fellow worker. (4:11)
The apostle had sent Tychicus to Ephesus. (4:12) Earlier, Tychicus, one of Paul’s beloved fellow workers from the Roman province of Asia, accompanied him in Greece, Macedonia, and Asia Minor. (Acts 20:2-4) During his first imprisonment in Rome, the apostle entrusted Tychicus with letters for the community of believers in Ephesus and in Colossae. At that time, Onesimus, Philemon’s runaway slave who had become a believer, accompanied Tychicus to rejoin Philemon as a brother in Christ. (Ephesians 6:21, 22; Colossians 4:7-9)
Sometime prior to his arrest, Paul seems to have stayed in the home of Carpus in Troas, on the northwest coast of Asia Minor, and appears to have departed during a time of warm weather. He left his cloak with Carpus and, therefore, asked Timothy to bring it with him. Additionally, he wanted to have his scrolls and particularly his parchments. The scrolls may have been either Hebrew or Greek manuscripts of the Hebrew Scriptures. Among these scrolls, some may have been made from parchment or animal skins, with the others being papyrus scrolls. Another possibility is that the parchments may have included copies of the apostle’s own letters to congregations and other then-existing Christian writings. With winter approaching (4:21), Paul would have wanted his cloak for warmth, and having the scrolls and parchments to read would have comforted him in his state of confinement. (4:13)
The apostle had suffered much harm from the metalworker Alexander. He did not doubt, however, that the Lord Jesus Christ, God’s appointed judge to whom all must render an account, would repay Alexander according to his deeds. (4:14) Paul warned Timothy to be on guard against him, for this metalworker had resisted his words. Alexander must have been defiant, doing whatever he could to undermine Paul’s labors or to hinder him from carrying out his commission as an apostle. (4:15)
When making his first defense as a prisoner, everyone who could have been of assistance to Paul abandoned him. He, though, did not reflect a spirit of bitterness or ill will toward any of them, but said, “May it not be reckoned against them.” (4:16)
Whereas humans forsook him, the Lord Jesus Christ stood by him. Paul sensed within himself the Lord’s strengthening so that, through him, the proclamation of God’s message might be fully made and that “all the nations might hear [it].” In making his defense before the highest authority in the Roman Empire, Paul, as he had before other rulers, would have proclaimed God’s message as it related to Jesus Christ. (Compare Acts 24:10-21; 26:1-29.) What the apostle then said in his defense would have become widely known, resulting in people of “all nations” hearing what he had proclaimed. Subsequent to his first defense, Paul was rescued “from the lion’s mouth.” In this case, his being delivered from the “lion’s mouth” may signify his escaping from mortal peril instead of his not being thrown to lions in the arena. (4:17; compare Psalm 22:21; 35:17; 57:4.)
Paul did not doubt that the Lord Jesus Christ would continue to rescue him from everything harmful and save him “for his heavenly kingdom.” This did not mean that the apostle believed that he would be delivered from all suffering or from being condemned to death, for he had endured many hardships and difficulties. But, as in the past, he would not be harmed by any evil attacks against him but would be strengthened and sustained in remaining faithful to his Lord, assuring that he would have a permanent place with him in the heavenly realm. This is the realm where Jesus Christ is recognized as King of kings and Lord of lords by his Father’s appointment. The Son of God is, therefore, in possession of surpassing glory, splendor, or magnificence. Appropriately, Paul made the prayerful expression, “To him [be] the glory forever and ever [literally, ‘into the ages of the ages’]. Amen [so be it].” (4:18)
The apostle then requested Timothy to extend greetings to Prisca (Priscilla) and Aquila and the household of Onesiphorus. (4:19) In view of the earlier reference to the service Onesiphorus had rendered in Ephesus, his household and Prisca and Aquila must have been in Ephesus at the time. (1:16-18) Paul had first met Prisca and Aquila in Corinth and worked with them in the tentmaking trade. Later, they accompanied him to Ephesus, where they remained after Paul traveled back to Jerusalem. (Acts 18:1-3, 18-23) For a time, they returned to Rome (Romans 16:3-5) and, from there, appear to have come back to Ephesus. Some have thought that Paul mentioned Prisca first because of her having a higher social standing in the Greco-Roman world than did her husband. It seems more likely, however, that the apostle mentioned her first because she excelled her husband in being able to explain the message about Christ to others and in taking the initiative to assist fellow believers. This possible reason seems to be more in keeping with the lesser value Paul placed on position or status. (Compare Galatians 2:6.)
The Erastus who remained in the city of Corinth may be the one with whom Paul sent Timothy to Macedonia some years earlier. (Acts 19:22) Trophimus, a believer from the city of Ephesus, accompanied Paul on the trip to Jerusalem with a contribution for needy believers there. While in Jerusalem, Paul was falsely accused of having brought Trophimus beyond the Court of the Gentiles, which accusation was a contributory factor in the apostle’s being mobbed and coming to be a prisoner under Roman authority. (Acts 20:3-5, 17, 22; 21:26-30; 24:6) It appears that after Paul’s release from his first imprisonment in Rome (Acts 28:16-31), Trophimus again accompanied him but became ill, making it impossible for him to continue laboring with the apostle in advancing the interests of Christ. Paul then continued on his way, leaving the ill Trophimus in Miletus, likely with fellow believers who could look after him. (4:20)
After requesting Timothy to do his utmost to join him before winter, the apostle conveyed the greetings of Eubulus, Pudens, Linus, Claudia, “and all the brothers,” or all other fellow believers with whom he then had association. (4:21)
The apostle concluded with the prayerful expression that the Lord Jesus Christ be with Timothy’s spirit, followed by the words, “The favor [be] with you.” Timothy’s “spirit” would be his disposition as a believer devoted to Christ. The Lord Jesus Christ would be with his spirit, supporting him and strengthening him in his godly desire to be faithful in fulfilling the commission that had been entrusted to him. (4:22)
“Amen” (so be it) is the last word in numerous manuscripts, whereas other manuscripts end the letter with the plural “you.” This would seem to indicate that what Paul had written was to be shared with fellow believers, for other believers besides Timothy are included in the apostle’s payer, “The favor [be] with you.” All believers are fellow sharers in gracious favor or unmerited kindness, which includes the guidance and aid which God and Christ provide. (4:22; see the Notes section.)
Notes:
In verse 1, numerous manuscripts read “according to his appearing” (not “and his appearing”).
In connection with suffering (verse 5), fifth-century Codex Alexandrinus adds, “as a good soldier of Christ Jesus.”
After “Lord” (in verse 22), many manuscripts add either “Jesus” or “Jesus Christ.”
The letter Paul addressed to him provided Titus with guidelines for handling a difficult situation among believers on the island of Crete. Cretans were among the Jews and proselytes in Jerusalem for the first Pentecost after Jesus’ resurrection. It is not known, however, whether any of those who had come from Crete became believers upon hearing Peter’s testimony about Jesus Christ. (Acts 2:1-41)
The letter to Titus and comments in other preserved correspondence suggest that the congregations on the island of Crete were comparatively new. In the Acts account, one finds no mention of Paul’s activity there. This would seem to indicate that the apostle did not proclaim the message about Christ on the island until after his first imprisonment in Rome and his subsequent release, apparently doing so with Titus as his fellow worker. Paul commonly endeavored to reach areas where the good news had not as yet been widely proclaimed, and this would appear to support the conclusion that no significant communities of believers existed on the island before his arrival. (2 Corinthians 10:13-16)
In his first letter to Timothy (1:3), he dealt with the situation in Ephesus, where there had been a congregation for some nine years at the time. So a considerable number of the believers would not have been new converts, and the apostle specifically directed Timothy not to appoint any recent convert as an overseer, caring for and looking after the spiritual well-being of fellow believers. (1 Timothy 3:6) In the letter to Titus, this requirement is not included, which may be regarded as an indication that, for the most part, believers on the island had then only recently responded to the message about Christ.
Though not named in the book of Acts, Titus had a relationship with Paul comparatively early in his extensive ministry among the non-Jews. In the letter to the Galatians (2:1, 3), the apostle identified Titus as a Greek brother who had accompanied him and Barnabas to Jerusalem, mentioning that he was not compelled to be circumcised. This visit would fit the time when Paul, Barnabas, and other brothers left Syrian Antioch for Jerusalem because certain believers who had come from Judea to Antioch claimed that, to be saved or to have a divinely approved standing, non-Jewish believers needed to be circumcised and live according to the requirements of the Mosaic law. (Acts 15:1-26)
A number of years later, the apostle sent Titus to Corinth to care for problems that had arisen in the congregation there and also to initiate a relief effort for needy believers in Jerusalem. Paul was deeply concerned about developments among the Corinthian believers and anxiously anticipated meeting Titus in Troas, a city on the northwestern coast of Asia Minor. When Titus did not arrive as had been planned, the apostle left for Macedonia. There he did meet Titus, and was greatly encouraged and comforted by the favorable report about the Corinthians he then received. (2 Corinthians 2:12, 13; 7:6, 7, 13-16) Later, Paul asked Titus to return to Corinth to complete arrangements for the relief effort, and he eagerly responded. (2 Corinthians 8:6, 16-18)
The last reference to Titus is in 2 Timothy 4:10. Paul was imprisoned in Rome for the second time and expected to be executed, and Titus had left for Dalmatia. Likely Titus had either departed at Paul’s request or for another good reason.
See http://www.holylandphotos.org/browse.asp?s=1,4,12,226 for information about and pictures of Crete.
Paul refers to himself as a “slave of God,” having been honored to be in the service of the Most High. Moreover, as an apostle of Jesus Christ, he had been sent forth to proclaim the message about him and what he had effected through his death for the human family. (1:1)
The Greek word katá, often meaning “according to,” here, in relation to faith and the “knowledge of the truth,” appears to function as a marker of purpose. So the significance would be that as a slave of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ, Paul served to further the faith of God’s elect or chosen ones (all who accept God’s invitation through his servants to become reconciled to him as his beloved children) and to aid them to become well-grounded in the knowledge of the truth about God and Christ, leading to an ever-closer relationship with them. (1:1)
Translators have variously rendered the phrase, “for the sake of the faith of God’s elect and the knowledge of the truth” (NRSV), “for the faith of God’s elect and the knowledge of the truth” (NIV), “to help the faith of God’s chosen people and to help them know the truth,” (NCV), “marked as such [a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ] by the faith of God’s chosen people and the knowledge of the truth enshrined in our religion” (REB), and “to bring those whom God has chosen to faith and to the knowledge of the truth.” (NJB)
The next phrase, which relates to godliness, also starts with katá (in its contracted form) and could either indicate the purpose the “knowledge of the truth” serves or point to godliness as accompanying the “knowledge of the truth.” Accordingly, the thought could be that the “knowledge of the truth” results in a godly life, or that godliness accompanies, manifests itself in, or is in harmony with this knowledge. (1:1)
The words, “upon the hope of eternal life,” seemingly reveal the powerful motivation for Paul’s faithfully discharging his responsibilities as a slave of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ. The hope itself was certain of fulfillment, for God, who does not lie, has given his promise as the sure foundation for the hope of coming to enjoy eternal life, the real life of a never-ending relationship with him and his Son as part of the sinless family of his beloved children. “Before eternal times,” or in ages past, God determined that humans would come to have a permanent relationship with him as his children. Therefore, Paul could speak of God’s promise as having been made “before eternal times.” (1:2)
In his “own times” (or at the appropriate appointed times), God revealed his “word” or message. This message, as the context indicates, pertains to the eternal life that God has promised and which comes to be the possession of all who put faith in his Son and the surrender of his life for them. The message itself was made known by its being proclaimed. As an apostle, Paul had been entrusted with the proclamation “by the command of God our Savior.” The apostle did not act on his own authority, but was commissioned to proclaim the message by God’s order. Being the ultimate source of the arrangement for delivering humans from sin and its consequences, God is the Savior. (1:3)
Paul addressed Titus as a “genuine child according [katá] to the shared faith.” In this way, the apostle may have affectionately identified Titus as a true fellow believer, one who shared the faith in God and Christ that the community of believers held in common. The term “child” may also imply that, by reason of the common faith, Titus was a member of God’s family of beloved children. In this context, the Greek word katá serves to indicate the reason for the close relationship existing between Paul and Titus. They had the same faith in common. (1:4)
Paul then added his prayerful expression, “Favor and peace from God the Father and Jesus Christ our Savior.” The gracious favor or unmerited kindness would include all the aid and guidance that the Father and his Son provide. Peace would be the inner sense of tranquility and calmness from the continued awareness that God and Christ would never fail to come to the aid of the believer, sustaining and strengthening the individual to be able to endure trials and distressing circumstances. (1:4; see the Notes section.)
Paul had left Titus on the island of Crete to care for matters that needed attention in the communities of believers and to designate qualified men as elders in every town where believers resided. According to a literal reading of the Greek text, Titus needed to “set right” (epidiorthóo) “the [things] left” (leípo). The term leípo can apply to something that is left behind or something that is lacking, and the word epidiorthóo can refer to the act of setting right, correcting, or setting right in addition to what had already been corrected. Modern translations convey various specific meanings. “I left you behind in Crete for this reason, so that you should put in order what remained to be done.” (NRSV) “My intention of leaving you behind in Crete was that you should deal with any outstanding matters.” (REB) “I left you in Crete to set right matters which needed attention.” (J. B. Phillips) “I left you in Crete to do what had been left undone.” (CEV) “I have left you behind in Crete in order that you may set right the things which still require attention.” (Weymouth) The apostle had given Titus orders or instructions to carry out his commission. The directives included guidelines he needed to follow when selecting men who would function as elders and servants. (1:5)
A qualified man would have to be “blameless” or known for conducting himself in an exemplary manner. A married man was to be the “husband of one wife.” This has been variously understood. In the Greco-Roman world, polygamy existed and divorce could be obtained on various grounds. Married men might have mistresses. So the meaning could be that a man should have only one living wife and be faithful to her. One ancient manuscript adds the following explanatory comment: “Do not appoint the twice married nor make them servants.” The strictest application would be to regard a man’s being the “husband of one wife” as being “married only once.” (NAB, revised edition) Whereas a number of interpretations are possible, the main thought is that any married man serving as an elder must be known for adhering to the highest standard in his married life. His family should also be exemplary, with the children being believers and not debauched and disobedient The children should be conducting themselves in a respectful, laudable manner. A charge of debauchery or intemperance in food, drink, or other areas of life would not be made respecting young children. This indicates that Paul had in mind children who were old enough to choose their own path. (1:6; see the Notes section.)
An elder is also an overseer, entrusted with the work of looking after the spiritual welfare of fellow believers and resisting corrupting influences from undermining their faith. He is “God’s steward,” or God’s servant with a special spiritual trust in the congregation, and accountable to him for the way he looked out for the interests and well-being of fellow believers. As God’s steward, he must be without reproach or free from valid censure, not arrogant, self-willed, overbearing or inconsiderate, not given to anger, not addicted to wine, not prone to violence, not shamelessly bent on gain. (1:7)
An elder or overseer would have to be a man who lived an exemplary life of moderation and contentment. He could not be a man who thought too highly of himself and was contemptuous of others, was easily irritated and quick to lose his temper, engaged in heavy drinking, flared up in rage (as is common among men given to drink), bullied others, or tended to settle matters with his fist. Others should know him as an honest man, not avaricious or shamelessly fond of dishonest gain. He would have to be completely trustworthy, never seeking to profit personally from the responsible service that had been committed to him. (1:7)
After having listed attributes that should not be tainting the life of an elder or overseer, Paul mentioned qualities that should distinguish a man who would be suitable for appointment. One who qualified to serve as an elder or overseer needed to be hospitable (philóxenos). The Greek word philóxenos literally signifies love for strangers, which would include being willing to open one’s home to fellow believers whom one did not know and to treat them as welcome guests. A love of goodness would be evident in a man’s actively doing and promoting whatever is good, right, noble, or praiseworthy. As a man to whom the Greek word sóphron applied, he would be sensible, thoughtful, and known for having sound judgment. A “righteous” or just man would be upright, honest, and impartial in his dealings with others. The Greek word hósios may be defined as “holy,” “pure,” or “devout” and would describe a man who has reverential regard for God and conducts himself accordingly. A man who has “self-control” is able to keep his emotions, impulses, or desires in check and is not given to rash or thoughtless behavior. (1:8)
“According to the teaching,” an overseer needed to hold to or adhere to the “faithful” or “trustworthy” word, or the truthful message about God and Christ as Paul had proclaimed it. The phrase “according to the teaching” could signify in his teaching or when teaching. Another meaning would be that the “faithful” or “trustworthy” word or message would be according to or in agreement with the content of sound teaching. (1:9) “By holding on to the trustworthy word just as we teach it, an elder can help people by using true teaching.” (NCV) “They [elders] must stick to the true message they were taught.” (CEV) “He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught.” (NIV) “He must have a firm grasp of the word that is trustworthy in accordance with the teaching.” (NRSV)
When adhering firmly to the dependable word, or the message that properly conveyed the truth about God and Christ, an elder would be able to encourage, admonish, or comfort fellow believers with sound teaching. He would also be in a position to reprove those who disputed, contradicted, or spoke against the truth, exposing their error and thereby protecting fellow believers from being deceived by plausible arguments and aiding those who had strayed to correct their ways. (1:9)
Many in the congregations on the island of Crete failed to be obedient to the truth Paul had taught. The apostle referred to these unsubmissive ones as “empty talkers,” foolish babblers, or windbags, and “deceivers of the mind” or misleaders. Especially were they to be found among the “circumcised” or Jewish believers. (1:10)
Possibly the problem had initially arisen when Jewish believers had been forced from their homes on account of persecution and had come to Crete, where their fellow Jewish believers received them hospitably. These newcomers may have placed great emphasis on law observance and, like those who stirred up trouble in Galatia, advocated circumcision and adherence to the law as being needed in order to be fully approved by God. (Compare Acts 21:20-24; Galatians 1:6, 7; 2:15-21; 3:1-5.) Possibly they claimed to know what the apostles and elders in Jerusalem had taught, and this may have carried great weight with believers in Crete. It is likely that these Jewish proponents of error distorted the truth that faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and as the one whom the Father resurrected from the dead was the all-essential requirement for being divinely approved. Their assertions about the law doubtless emphasized human effort as the prime way to gain a right standing with God.
In view of their ruinous influence, Paul wrote, “They must be silenced.” Titus, therefore, would need to expose their error and keep it from spreading, for these teachers of falsehood “overturned whole households, teaching what they ought not for shameful gain.” This suggests that they succeeded in getting all members of certain households to accept their distortions of the truth that Paul proclaimed. The “shameful gain” could have been the prominence they sought for themselves and attained and the financial support they received from those who were deceived by them. (1:11)
Although Jews, these teachers of falsehood apparently had yielded to the corrupt influences of Cretan society. In commenting on the moral corruption existing among the Cretans, Paul quoted a familiar saying, which he attributed to their own Cretan prophet, “Cretans [are] always liars, evil beasts, idle bellies.” (1:12)
In this case, the apostle used the term “prophet” in the broad sense the word had in the Greco-Roman world. Poets were thought to be inspired by the Muses (the nine sister goddesses of Greek mythology) and so were regarded as speakers for the Muses or as prophets. (1:12)
Clement of Alexandria (c. 150-c. 215 CE) attributed the saying to Epimenides of Crete. (Stromata, Book I, chapter 14) No works of Epimenides have survived, and so there is no way to establish the setting in which the words may have appeared (if indeed originally from Epimenides). The quotation suggests that the ancient Cretans were not known for being truthful and proved to be vicious and gluttonous. (1:12)
Paul acknowledged the testimony of the Cretan “prophet” as true or as an apt description of the moral condition existing among the Cretans in his day. For this reason, the apostle admonished Titus to rebuke the believers sharply. This indicates that they reflected the flaws of the general populace and so needed to be rebuked in very strong terms in order to jolt them to their senses with a view to their becoming healthy or sound in the faith. The wrong teaching to which certain ones among them had given heed led to their coming to be in an unhealthy spiritual state. So they needed to become sound in the faith that was solidly based on Jesus’ example and teaching, and not to give heed to Jewish myths and the commands of men who rejected the truth. Speculative fables diverted attention away from focusing on teaching that served to strengthen faith and promoted upright conduct. The truth particularly related to Jesus Christ and that an approved standing with his Father depended solely on having come to be at one with him through faith in him and his sacrificial death, which faith manifested itself in an upright life. Commands of men that contradicted this truth proved to be spiritually ruinous. (1:13, 14; see the Notes section.)
The Jewish deceivers to whom Paul referred appear to have insisted on the need to abstain from certain foods in order to be divinely approved. This seems to be the reason behind his words, “Everything [is] clean to clean [persons]; to the defiled and unbelieving, however, nothing [is] clean, but even [their] very mind and conscience are defiled.” Persons who were pure in mind and conscience did not look upon any food that was acceptable for consumption as unclean, but accepted it gratefully as God’s provision for them. (Compare 1 Timothy 4:3-5.) The teachers of error, though, did not look at matters in this way. They rejected the teaching of Jesus that defilement did not result from what entered a person’s mouth. (Mark 7:14-23) Their wrong view of the nature of defilement meant that they were defiled in mind, and this defilement affected their conscience, which gave rise to the unwarranted scruples that they commanded others to observe. With defiled minds and consciences, the teachers of error would be in no position to make any proper evaluation of what was either clean or unclean. (1:15)
They might confess or claim that they knew God or had a relationship with him, but their works or deeds would deny their claim. In disposition, word, and action, they did not reflect God’s ways, proving that they had no relationship with him. Therefore, the apostle described them as “abominable, disobedient, and unsuitable for any good work.” Their ruinous influence made them abominable or detestable. They did not obey the truth, for they failed to act according to the example and teaching of God’s Son. Their activity worked against his interests and proved to be harmful, bringing spiritual ruin to entire households. They demonstrated themselves to be completely unfit for any “good work,” or for anything that contributed to promoting and strengthening genuine faith in God and Christ. (1:16)
Notes:
After “favor” (in verse 4), numerous manuscripts add “mercy.”
In verse 6, the reference to the children could either be understood to mean that they should be believers or that they should be faithful or trustworthy.
The opinions of rabbis that are preserved in the Babylonian Talmud provide examples of “myths” (verse 14) or mere fables of a speculative nature. “Our Rabbis taught: Egypt is four hundred parasangs by four hundred, and it is one sixtieth of the size of Ethiopia; Ethiopia is one sixtieth of the world, and the world is one sixtieth of the Garden [of Eden], and the Garden is one sixtieth of Eden, and Eden is one sixtieth of Gehenna; thus the whole world compared with the Gehenna is but as a lid to the pot.” (Ta‘anith, 10a) In Baba Mezi‘a, 59a, and Shabbath, 56a, David’s adultery with Bathsheba is explained away. She supposedly had received a bill of divorce from her husband Uriah before he went off to war, and the bill of divorce was to take effect retroactively if he did not return alive. So, while he was away, Bathsheba could be regarded as a woman who might be divorced or who might be married.
Among the Dead Sea Scrolls are writings that preserve Jewish fables that embellish the biblical accounts. According to what has been called “The Genesis Apocryphon” (a fragmentary manuscript thought to date either from the late first century BCE or the early part of the first century CE) relates that Lamech suspected that his wife had conceived by one of the “Watchers” or “Holy Ones,” that is, by one of the fallen angels. “The fruit was planted by you,” she insisted, “and by no stranger or Watcher or Son of Heaven.” Her denial did not convince him, but he asked his father Methuselah to travel to paradise to consult Enoch for confirmation about the nature of the conception.
Unlike the proponents of error, Titus needed to speak about matters that were fitting or suitable for “healthful,” sound, or wholesome teaching or instruction. His words were to contribute toward helping fellow believers to grow in faith and to make progress in living a life consistent with their faith. (2:1)
Paul’s previous words included comments about the requirements for those who would function as elders and servants in the community of believers. Here his reference is to older men generally. As believers, older men should be “sober [nephálios], serious [semnós], sensible [sóphron], healthy in faith, in love, in endurance [hypomoné].” (2:2)
The Greek term nephálios often relates to being moderate in drink but can have a broader significance. In this context, the word is probably to be understood as describing a person who is moderate or temperate, using restraint and avoiding extremes. (2:2)
A man to whom the word semnós applies would be serious or dignified in disposition and bearing. He would not be a person who is frivolous in his deportment nor would he treat important matters lightly. (2:2)
For a man to be described as sóphron would identify him as being sensible, prudent, or thoughtful. In his words and actions, he would reveal himself to be a person with good judgment. (2:2)
A “healthy” faith would be a sound, genuine, or solidly grounded faith. There is also a possibility that, in this context, faith denotes “faithfulness,” dependability, or trustworthiness. In that case, a man who is “healthy in faithfulness,” would prove himself to be outstandingly trustworthy. Love involves a selfless concern for others, a willingness to forgo one’s own interests to benefit fellow humans. A “healthy” love is genuine and strong, for it calls for courage when one’s coming to the aid of others poses serious personal risks. The Greek term hypomoné describes the capacity to endure under difficult circumstances, doing so patiently. For a man to be “healthy in endurance” would signify that he is strong in steadfastness, fortitude, perseverance, and patience, not easily giving in to complaint and despondency. (2:2)
Older women should likewise be exemplary, reverent in their conduct or demeanor, “not slanderers [literally, devils], not enslaved to much wine, teachers of good.” In keeping with their age and experience, older believing women should have a dignity or noble bearing that gave evidence of reverentialness or a purity of life. Their conversations should be meaningful and free from the kind of talk characteristic of idle gossips or slanderers. They should not be dulling their senses with drink. Listeners should be able to benefit from their words, learning good things from their fund of knowledge. (2:3)
As teachers of what is good, older women would be able to aid younger women to be praiseworthy examples. Their wise words could urge younger women to conduct themselves aright, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, chaste, good workers at home, subjecting themselves to their own husbands, “so that the word of God may not be blasphemed.” (2:4, 5)
In the community of believers, younger married women were to be good wives and mothers, caring well for their responsibilities toward their own husbands and children, and having loving concern for their well-being. In handling family matters, they should have been sensible, thoughtful, or prudent, managing resources wisely for the benefit of all. As chaste women, they should have conducted themselves with decency and modesty. For them to be good workers at home would have meant that they attended well to household duties, giving no occasion for legitimate complaint or censure about how they discharged their responsibilities. In being submissive to their own husbands, the younger women would have accorded them the respect that was their rightful due as family heads and would have been cooperative and supportive. Their laudable conduct as wives and mothers would have honored God and Christ. It would not have given any valid basis for others to speak abusively of the “word of God,” or the divine message that centered on Christ and what his Father accomplished through him. If unbelievers had noticed that believing women did not conduct themselves like respectable wives and mothers in the community, they would have been inclined to attribute this to their belief and thus the “word of God” would have been brought into disrepute. (2:4, 5)
Paul directed Titus likewise to admonish or encourage the younger men to be sound in mind or sensible, using good judgment and exercising self-control. He himself needed to set a praiseworthy example in doing “good works.” These good works would have included every aspect of his conduct and activity that brought honor to God and Christ. (2:6, 7)
In his teaching, Titus needed to maintain “incorruption” (aphthoría), purity, or soundness, and seriousness. Instead of aphthoría, numerous other manuscripts contain a form of aphthonía (freedom from envy, which could signify willingness or the absence of any desire for personal gain) or adiaphthoría (sincerity or integrity). “Seriousness” in teaching would reflect a reverential and dignified manner and bearing. (2:7)
The reference to his being an example in “healthful word” that would not be censured could mean that Titus needed to make sure to convey sound teaching in a proper manner. (2:8) Translators have variously rendered the expression. “Use clean language that no one can criticize.” (CEV) “Your speech should be unaffected and logical.” (J. B. Phillips) “Speak the truth so that you cannot be criticized.” (NCV) “Offer sound instruction to which none can take exception.” (REB)
By being exemplary in his conduct and teaching, Titus would avoid providing an opening for an opponent to find legitimate fault. Any opponent would thus be put to shame because of being unable to justify saying anything bad about Titus (literally, “about us”). The plural “us” would include Paul or even the whole community of believers, as the wrongs of one member can reflect unfavorably on everyone. (2:8)
Slaves were to be submissive to their own masters “in everything,” that is, everything related to carrying out their assigned duties. “Everything” would not have included obedience to commands that would have required them to engage in dishonesty or lawlessness. Otherwise, in all respects, slaves should have done their best to please their owners, being diligent about doing what was expected of them. They were to be respectful, not talking back. (2:9)
Slaves were to be honest, not stealing from their masters but being completely trustworthy (literally, “demonstrating all good faith” or “all good fidelity”). Their diligence in following through on their duties, their laudable conduct, and their dependability would “adorn the teaching of our Savior, God, in everything.” As believers in the divine teaching about Jesus Christ and what his Father effected through him, exemplary slaves would make this teaching attractive to observers. It would reveal the transforming power for good that adherence to the teaching produced. God is the ultimate source of salvation or deliverance from sin and its consequences and, therefore, is the Savior of all believers. “In everything” that believing slaves did in a praiseworthy manner they would be adorning God’s teaching. (2:10)
The gracious favor or unmerited kindness of God became manifest when Jesus Christ ministered on earth and surrendered his life, making it possible for all who put faith in him to be forgiven of their sins and to be reconciled to his Father as beloved children. The words “to all men” can either relate to the reality that deliverance from sin and condemnation is available to all humans or that the manifestation of divine favor has been made to everyone. (2:11) Both meanings are found in modern translations. “For the grace of God has appeared, saving all.” (NAB) “For the grace of God has dawned upon the world with healing for all mankind.” (REB) “For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men.” (NIV)
All who accept God’s gracious favor are instructed to renounce “ungodliness and worldly lusts.” They are instructed, disciplined, or trained in this respect by coming to the recognition that the cleansing from sin effected through Christ’s surrender of his life in keeping with his Father’s will requires conduct that is consistent with their faith in him and the divine arrangement for salvation. Accordingly, believers would reject everything that is contrary to God’s will and would resist the desires or lusts existing in the world of mankind in its state of alienation from him. In the present age, the life of believers should reflect sensibleness, sound judgment, or self-restraint, righteousness, uprightness, or honesty, and godliness or reverentialness. (2:12)
While conducting themselves in an exemplary manner, believers would be waiting for the fulfillment of “the happy hope and the manifestation of the glory of the great God and Savior of us, Jesus Christ.” This hope is the prospect of being united with Christ for all eternity in the sinless state. It is a “happy” or “blessed” hope, for its fulfillment will result in unspeakable joy and contentment upon having been found divinely approved and sharers in all the privileges and blessings that stem from having an enduring relationship with God and Christ. The Greek could be understood to mean that Jesus Christ is the “great God and Savior” of believers. Elsewhere in the Scriptures, however, Jesus is never called the “great God.” So the meaning appears to be that the glory, splendor, or magnificence of God, the Father, and of our Savior Christ Jesus will be revealed upon Christ’s return. (2:13) A number of modern translations, either in the main text or in footnotes, convey this significance. “And while we live this life we hope and wait for the glorious dénouement of God himself and of Jesus Christ our Savior.” (J. B. Phillips) “While we wait for the blessed hope and the manifestation of the glory of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ.” (NRSV, footnote) “We are filled with hope, as we wait for the glorious return of our great God and our Savior Jesus Christ” or “the return of Jesus Christ, who is the glory of our great God and Savior.” (CEV, footnote)
In the capacity of our Savior, Jesus Christ “gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all lawlessness and cleanse for himself a special people, zealous for good works.” Upon surrendering his life, Jesus Christ provided the basis for all who put faith in him to be redeemed or rescued from their lawless ways, ceasing to be the victims of personal lawlessness and in line for the associated condemnatory judgment. With his precious blood, Jesus Christ purchased all humans, and the cleansing that he effected with his blood in the case of those who put faith in him made them his special people, a people that belonged to him as his unique possession. As his cleansed people, they should be zealous for good works. These works would include all conduct and activity that honors Christ and promotes his interests. (2:14)
Paul had called attention to the kind of conduct that should distinguish the life of believers, including that of older men, older women, younger women, younger men, and slaves. These were the matters about which Titus was to continue to speak, exhorting and reproving believers on the island of Crete and doing so with all authority (literally, “all command,” denoting the authority or right to give orders or commands to correct wrongs). In carrying out his assignment, Titus was not to let anyone look down on him. This would have required his setting a good example, maintaining the kind of conduct and bearing that left no opening for valid censure. (2:15)
The apostle asked Titus to remind believers to be submissive “to rulers, to authorities [‘to rulers and to authorities,’ according to other manuscripts], to be obedient, to be prepared for every good work.” In this context, “every good work” would mean activity and conduct that rulers or governmental officials regarded as good. Believers were to conduct themselves in a law-abiding manner, conscientiously complying with all laws that did not interfere with their loyalty to God and Christ, showing respect for rulers or officials, obediently responding to their directives, and being prepared or ready and willing to do more than the required tasks. (3:1; compare Matthew 5:41; Romans 13:3.)
In their interactions with others, which would include rulers or officials, believers were not to blaspheme. In keeping with this admonition, they would not resort to abusive speech when faced with unreasonable demands or unpleasant tasks. While others might be disposed to fight with words, believers were not to quarrel but to be gentle, reasonable, yielding, or tolerant, and demonstrate themselves to be mild, considerate, or courteous “toward all men” or all fellow humans. (3:2)
Before coming to be reconciled to God as beloved children, believers had lived like persons who were alienated from him. They had been senseless, conducting themselves without using good judgment and harming themselves and others. Instead of being responsive to sound direction, reasonable requests, the prodding of their conscience, or God’s ways, they were disobedient and misled, blindly following a wayward course. They had been enslaved to various desires and passions, acting without restraint in pursuing what gave them pleasure and giving no thought to the hurtful consequences to themselves or others. Moral corruption and envy had dominated their lives. They were despicable or abhorrent in their behavior, manifesting hatred for others. Based on their former conduct, believers needed to be diligent in cooperating with the leading of God’s spirit and live as his obedient children. (3:3)
Although so very much was seriously wrong in the way humans conducted themselves, God took the initiative to provide the basis for them to be reconciled to him. He, as the Savior, manifested his kindness or graciousness and loving concern for and interest in humans. This was when he sent his Son to the earth and had him surrender his life for the world of mankind, providing the means for being forgiven of sins and delivered from the condemnation to which sin leads. (3:4)
God was under no obligation to any member of the human family to show this great kindness and love. He did not act, as Paul continued, on the basis of “works in righteousness which we had done, but according to his mercy he saved us through the washing of regeneration and renewal by holy spirit.” (3:5)
Sinful humans have no works or deeds that merit being the object of God’s love. They are not inherently righteous or upright but flawed, and their actions are likewise tainted. So when God took the initiative in providing the means for rescuing humans from their sinful state, he did so in expression of his mercy or compassion, taking pity on them in their helpless condition as slaves of sin. (3:5)
The “washing of regeneration” appears to denote water of baptism. Before presenting themselves for immersion, those who put their faith in Christ Jesus repent of their sins and petition God for forgiveness. So their baptism is a tangible expression of their repentance and the start of a new life as cleansed individuals. According to Paul’s letter to the Romans, believers are baptized “into Christ,” being united to him as members of his body and sharing in his experiences as their head. Their baptism “into Christ,” therefore, is also a baptism “into his death.” Thus believers, at the time of their immersion, die to their former self and are raised to a newness of life. They are thus cleansed from their sinful past life as by a washing and are regenerated. (Romans 6:1-3; compare Acts 2:38; Galatians 3:26, 27; 1 Peter 3:21.) With the holy spirit operating upon them, believers are renewed, guided and strengthened to live a newness of life that honors God and Christ. (3:5)
In his words to Nicodemus, Jesus Christ similarly associated the new birth with water and spirit, telling him, “Unless a person is born from water and spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” (John 3:5) This link of water and spirit had already been set forth in the prophetic writings. Through his prophet Ezekiel, God declared, “I will sprinkle clean water upon you, and you shall be clean: I will cleanse you from all your uncleanness and from all your fetishes. And I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit into you: I will remove the heart of stone from your body and give you a heart of flesh; and I will put My spirit into you. Thus I will cause you to follow My laws and faithfully to observe My rules.” (Ezekiel 36:25-28, Tanakh [JPS, 1985 edition])
Literal water does not effect the cleansing, but God’s action in forgiving sins does the purifying and then makes the forgiven ones new by causing his spirit to operate within them. In view of the close connection of God’s forgiveness to an individual’s immersion in water and the commencement of a new life, baptism may fittingly be designated as the “washing of regeneration.” (3:5)
“Through Jesus Christ our Savior,” God poured out his spirit richly, or in a superabundant way, upon believers. (Compare Acts 2:33.) The Lord Jesus Christ is the Savior, for he surrendered his life for the human family, making it possible for believers to be forgiven of sins and liberated from the condemnation to which sin leads. With the fullness of God’s spirit at work within them, believers are guided and strengthened to continue living a life consistent with their having been cleansed from the stain of sin. (3:6)
Upon being forgiven of their transgressions and granted the holy spirit, believers are justified or put right with God. Their justification is an expression of his gracious favor or unmerited kindness. As justified persons, believers are God’s children. Consequently, his gracious favor makes it possible for them, as his children, to become “heirs according to the hope of eternal life.” “Eternal life” is the real life of an enduring relationship with God and Christ. Ultimately, this life is to be enjoyed in the sinless state for all eternity. For believers, the eternal life in all its fullness is a prospective possession and, therefore, a future inheritance. So they have become heirs on the basis of the certain fulfillment of their hope of eternal life. (3:7)
As set forth in the preceding verses, the “faithful,” trustworthy, or dependable word is that deliverance from sin and all the beneficent results to believers are expressions of God’s kindness, love, and mercy. Paul wanted Titus, in carrying out his commission on the island of Crete, to insist on the things he had mentioned regarding how believers should be conducting themselves. The object in view was that those who “believed in God” would keep their minds focused on good works, always endeavoring to live in a manner that honored God and Jesus Christ. This would have included every aspect of their life ― their attitude, speech, and activity. All such good works are “good and beneficial to men,” that is, they are deeds that benefit fellow humans and result in good. (3:8)
Titus, though, needed to avoid involvement in matters that would not benefit others. Among the things to be shunned were foolish “seekings,” searchings, or questionings, genealogies, strife, and fights or disputes about the law. Foolish questionings would be idle inquiries that produce controversy but yield nothing beneficial. (3:9; see the Notes section.)
The Jews in particular were prone to delve extensively into genealogies, which did nothing to promote faith. According to the Babylonian Talmud (Pesahim 62b), the daughter of Hanina ben Teradion studied 300 laws from 300 teachers in one day (which is proably an exaggeration) but could not complete the “Book of Genealogies” (likely designating a commentary on Chronicles, specifically its many genealogical lists) in three years. Regarding the passage beginning with the words “And Azel had six sons” (1 Chronicles 8:38) and ending with “these were the sons of Azel” (1 Chronicles 9:44), the many different interpretations are referred to as being the loads of “four hundred camels.” Although doubtless to be regarded as hyperbole, the comments illustrate that preoccupation with genealogies would have been a time-consuming effort that gave rise to questions and debates. (3:9)
Foolish questionings and undue attention to genealogies tend to generate speculative views. The resulting widely different opinions give rise to disagreements, disputes, and strife, with individuals being adamant about the correctness of their views. Similarly, when the Mosaic law is used as a basis for formulating other commands and rules, inevitably individuals will disagree about the validity of such derived regulations. Whenever the arguing parties are determined to defend their views and persuade others, verbal fights erupt. All such fighting with words is unprofitable and vain, futile, or worthless. Neither those who engage in such battles nor those who witness them are drawn closer to God. (3:9)
If a man in the community of believers proved himself to be sectarian, causing division among believers by insisting on erroneous views, Titus was to admonish him, seeking to make clear to him the error of his ways. When the sectarian man refused to change after being admonished twice, Titus did not have to deal with him any further but was to reject him as disapproved. (3:10) In that case, as Paul continued, Titus would have known that the man was twisted (ekstrépho) and guilty of sin, “being self-condemned.” Such a man would have deliberately chosen his course and insisted upon it despite the efforts to correct him. Therefore, by his defiant course of action, he would have condemned himself. The Greek term ekstrépho denotes to turn aside or to turn out of the way and relates to a deviation from what is true, right, or proper. A departure from the right way is sin, a failure to act in harmony with God's will. (3:11)
Upon sending Artemas or Tychicus to him, Paul wanted Titus to do his best to come to him at Nicopolis. This likely was the Nicopolis of Epirus located in northwestern Greece, and it was in this city that the apostle planned to stay for the winter. (3:12)
Titus must have been aware of the particular service Paul had in mind respecting Zenas and Apollos. When sending them on their way, Titus was to make sure that they did not lack anything, or see to it that they were adequately supplied for the journey. Paul used the Greek word nomikós to identify Zenas. This may mean that Zenas had functioned as a scribe, a legal expert, or a man who was learned in the law. As a man well-acquainted with the Mosaic law, Zenas may either have been a Jew or a proselyte. Apollos, a Jewish believer from Alexandria, Egypt, benefited from the spiritual assistance of Aquila and Priscilla upon his arrival in Ephesus. An eloquent speaker, Apollos later did much in furthering the cause of Christ in Corinth. Some among the Corinthian believers, however, came to have a wrong view of men who ministered in their midst and, impressed by the eloquence of Apollos, they improperly identified themselves with him as their leader. (Acts 18:26-28; 19:1; 1 Corinthians 1:10-12; 3:6) Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians (3:5-9) indicates that this development was not the fault of Apollos, and the apostle recognized him as his fellow worker with God. (3:13)
As far as believers (literally, “ours”) were concerned, Paul wanted them to learn devote themselves to “good works” to meet their essential needs and not to be unproductive. Believers should be engaged in honest labor so as to obtain the necessities of life. They were not to be idle but industrious. (3:14) The believers in Crete would thus reveal themselves to be unlike those Cretans who could be described as “idle bellies” or idle gluttons, according to the words of one of their own Cretan “prophets” or poets. (1:12)
The conclusion of the letter indicates that Paul intended its contents to be shared with believers on the island of Crete. He extended the greetings of all those then with him and asked Titus to greet those who “love us in the faith,” that is, all whose love proved to be grounded in the common faith in God and Christ that those sending the greetings and those being greeted shared. The prayerful expression the apostle added ends with the plural “you,” “The favor [be] with all of you.” For believers to experience gracious divine favor or unmerited kindness would include their continuing to benefit from the help and guidance of which God and Christ are the source. (3:15; see the Notes section.)
Notes:
The Greek term for “strife” (in verse 9) is plural in numerous manuscripts and so refers to repeated disagreements. Other manuscripts, however, contain the singular word for “strife.”
In verse 15, a number of manuscripts identify the “favor” as being either “of the Lord” or “of God.”
“Amen” (so be it) ends the letter according to the reading of numerous manuscripts.